BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequalities - Wierd doubt

Expert replies
by sam2304 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:19 am
If x, y and z are positive integers, is x > y > z ?

1. xz > yz => x > y - no info about z INSUFF.
2. yx > yz => x > z - no info about y INSUFF.

So ans choice is C or E.
I went this way using both.
Divide 1 by 2. we get z/y > 1 => z > y since all are positive. Already we have from 1 and 2 that x > y and x > z so combining the three i get x > z > y which is a NO (is x > y > z ?) using C. I don't know if i am being stupid but everything seems right. What's wrong in the above approach. Am i missing something ? Enlighten me please :(

OA is E.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by sl750 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:13 am
I think you made a mistake when you combined both statements

In statement 1, we know x>z. In statement 2, we know x>y. However, we do not whether y>z or z>y. Therefore we cannot conclude sufficiently whether x>y>z or not
Join the discussion

by sam2304 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:42 pm
By combining i have got z > y and hence x > z > y.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:54 am
sam2304 wrote:
I went this way using both.
Divide 1 by 2. we get z/y > 1 => z > y since all are positive.
I've highlighted your mistake. You absolutely can NOT divide one inequality by another. You can see why this is not correct just using numerical examples. The following inequalities are both true:

4 > 2
3 > 1

but if we divide the first inequality by the second, the result is not true.

You certainly can divide one *equation* by another (though it isn't often useful to do that), at least as long as you're sure you're not dividing by zero. In fact, with equations we can combine them (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc) in almost any way we like. That is certainly *not* the case for inequalities. With two inequalities, you can always safely add them together if they face the same way, though you'd only ever consider doing that in a question with at least 2 unknowns. You cannot safely subtract or divide (these are just wrong) inequalities, or even multiply them if negative numbers might be involved.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by varungoel » Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:28 pm
does anyone have an under 2 minute solution to this problem?
Join the discussion