If x, y and z are positive integers, is x > y > z ?
1. xz > yz => x > y - no info about z INSUFF.
2. yx > yz => x > z - no info about y INSUFF.
So ans choice is C or E.
I went this way using both.
Divide 1 by 2. we get z/y > 1 => z > y since all are positive. Already we have from 1 and 2 that x > y and x > z so combining the three i get x > z > y which is a NO (is x > y > z ?) using C. I don't know if i am being stupid but everything seems right. What's wrong in the above approach. Am i missing something ? Enlighten me please
OA is E.
Inequalities - Wierd doubt
This topic has expert replies
- sam2304
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 am
- Thanked: 233 times
- Followed by:26 members
- GMAT Score:680
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
- sl750
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
- Thanked: 38 times
- Followed by:1 members
I think you made a mistake when you combined both statements
In statement 1, we know x>z. In statement 2, we know x>y. However, we do not whether y>z or z>y. Therefore we cannot conclude sufficiently whether x>y>z or not
In statement 1, we know x>z. In statement 2, we know x>y. However, we do not whether y>z or z>y. Therefore we cannot conclude sufficiently whether x>y>z or not
- sam2304
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 am
- Thanked: 233 times
- Followed by:26 members
- GMAT Score:680
By combining i have got z > y and hence x > z > y.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Ian Stewart
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
- Location: Montreal
- Thanked: 1090 times
- Followed by:355 members
- GMAT Score:780
I've highlighted your mistake. You absolutely can NOT divide one inequality by another. You can see why this is not correct just using numerical examples. The following inequalities are both true:sam2304 wrote:
I went this way using both.
Divide 1 by 2. we get z/y > 1 => z > y since all are positive.
4 > 2
3 > 1
but if we divide the first inequality by the second, the result is not true.
You certainly can divide one *equation* by another (though it isn't often useful to do that), at least as long as you're sure you're not dividing by zero. In fact, with equations we can combine them (add, subtract, multiply, divide, etc) in almost any way we like. That is certainly *not* the case for inequalities. With two inequalities, you can always safely add them together if they face the same way, though you'd only ever consider doing that in a question with at least 2 unknowns. You cannot safely subtract or divide (these are just wrong) inequalities, or even multiply them if negative numbers might be involved.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com