Inequality Prob

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:09 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

Inequality Prob

by vishwas.arora » Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:35 am
If square roots of numbers are considered positive and sqrt (a) + sqrt (b) = sqrt (c) + sqrt (d) + sqrt (e) , then is a < c?

(1) c = d
(2) sqrt (b) + sqrt (d) < sqrt (e)

Pl read sqrt (x) as positive square root of x

Can anyone please explain the arithmetic approach..

Thanks in advance.

OA B
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Aug 01, 2011 3:08 am
vishwas.arora wrote:If square roots of numbers are considered positive and sqrt (a) + sqrt (b) = sqrt (c) + sqrt (d) + sqrt (e) , then is a < c?

(1) c = d
(2) sqrt (b) + sqrt (d) < sqrt (e)

Pl read sqrt (x) as positive square root of x

Can anyone please explain the arithmetic approach..

Thanks in advance.

OA B
Stem equation rephrased:
√c = √a + (√b - √d - √e).

If (√b - √d - √e) > 0, then √c > √a and c>a.

Question rephrased: Is √b - √d - √e > 0?

Statement 1: c = d.
No way to determine whether √b - √d - √e > 0.
Insufficient.

Statement 2: √b + √d < √e.
√b + √d - √e < 0.
√b + √d - 2√d - √e < -2√d.
√b - √d - √e < -2√d.
Since -2√d < 0, we know that √b - √d - √e < 0.
Sufficient.

The correct answer is B.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:09 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

by vishwas.arora » Mon Aug 01, 2011 6:22 am
Thanks a lot Mitch.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:19 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:7 members

by Ozlemg » Mon Aug 01, 2011 6:43 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
vishwas.arora wrote:If square roots of numbers are considered positive and sqrt (a) + sqrt (b) = sqrt (c) + sqrt (d) + sqrt (e) , then is a < c?

(1) c = d
(2) sqrt (b) + sqrt (d) < sqrt (e)

Pl read sqrt (x) as positive square root of x

Can anyone please explain the arithmetic approach..

Thanks in advance.

OA B
Stem equation rephrased:
√c = √a + (√b - √d - √e).

If (√b - √d - √e) > 0, then √c < √a and c<a.
Question rephrased: Is √b - √d - √e > 0?

Statement 1: c = d.
No way to determine whether √b - √d - √e > 0.
Insufficient.

Statement 2: √b + √d < √e.
√b + √d - √e < 0.
√b + √d - 2√d - √e < -2√d.
√b - √d - √e < -2√d.
Since -2√d < 0, we know that √b - √d - √e < 0.
Sufficient.

The correct answer is B.
Hi
What do you think about the red part? Isnt it vice versa?
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:11 am
Ozlemg wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
vishwas.arora wrote:If square roots of numbers are considered positive and sqrt (a) + sqrt (b) = sqrt (c) + sqrt (d) + sqrt (e) , then is a < c?

(1) c = d
(2) sqrt (b) + sqrt (d) < sqrt (e)

Pl read sqrt (x) as positive square root of x

Can anyone please explain the arithmetic approach..

Thanks in advance.

OA B
Stem equation rephrased:
√c = √a + (√b - √d - √e).

If (√b - √d - √e) > 0, then √c < √a and c<a.
Question rephrased: Is √b - √d - √e > 0?

Statement 1: c = d.
No way to determine whether √b - √d - √e > 0.
Insufficient.

Statement 2: √b + √d < √e.
√b + √d - √e < 0.
√b + √d - 2√d - √e < -2√d.
√b - √d - √e < -2√d.
Since -2√d < 0, we know that √b - √d - √e < 0.
Sufficient.

The correct answer is B.
Hi
What do you think about the red part? Isnt it vice versa?
Yes, indeed! I've corrected the typo in my original post. Thanks.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:52 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by ArpanaAmishi » Mon Aug 01, 2011 10:42 pm
Hi GMATGuru,
Since -2√d < 0, we know that √b - √d - √e < 0.

Could you please elaborate on bold part ...I couldn't get from where we got this relationship.