Another 690 Debate: Should I retake?

[novagal]

Like many, I'm a first time poster, but long time lurker on this forum! Having taken the GMAT today for the second time today, I am very conflicted on whether to retake again, given that I am a hair below my target goal of 700. I was hoping the GMAT would help compensate my lower undergrad GPA. Here are my stats:

1. First time: 660 Q 45 V 36
2. Second time: 690 Q 44 V 40
AWA 6

Undergrad: UVA
GPA: 3.2
Race/Gender: Female/Asian-American
Experience: 4+ years in management & IT consulting
Target: Columbia (first choice), Stern, Kellogg, Darden, Booth, Georgetown, Michigan

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

[vineeshp]

If your target score is 700 and you have 690, there is no need for a retake. It wont help you to get 10 points extra.

You are from IT consulting. If you can build a story about why you need an MBA, that will be time better spent than a GMAT to score just a few points extra. GMAT has a reasonable error correction zone of +/-30. So if your level is 700, it is possible that you score slightly lower or higher than that. There is no guarantee a next attempt will give you 700. But if you think your performance levels are way above 700 and the 690 does not adequately represent your score, go ahead!

[prodizy]

By getting a great GMAT score you can make a point to the admission committee that you can take the rigorous course load of a MBA program (especially when your GPA is on the lower side).

A great GMAT score is always an advantage. You are competing with pool of applications where GMAT scores are on the higher side(IT professionals). If you think you can improve the score and you have enough time to take GMAT again without effecting application process, go for it one last time. You should aim to hit at least 49 in Quant.

If you have an extra ordinary story to tell the admissions committee then don't bother with GMAT and focus on telling your story(work ex, how you are different from others, recos, essays...)

All the best.