Leo can buy a certain computer for p1 dollars in State A, where the sales tax is t1 percent, or he can
buy the same computer for p2 dollars in State B, where the sales tax is t2 percent. Is the total cost
of the computer greater in State A than in State B?
(1) t1 > t2
(2) p1t1 > p2t2
[DS][tax&profit] HSPA posts
This topic has expert replies
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Question: Is A>B?HSPA wrote:Leo can buy a certain computer for p1 dollars in State A, where the sales tax is t1 percent, or he can
buy the same computer for p2 dollars in State B, where the sales tax is t2 percent. Is the total cost
of the computer greater in State A than in State B?
(1) t1 > t2
(2) p1t1 > p2t2
We can plug in values that satisfy the conditions given.
Statement 1: t1 > t2
No information about p1 and p2, so no way to compare A and B.
Insufficient.
Statement 2: p1t1 > p2t2
Let p1 = 100 and t1 = 20, so that p1t1 = 100*20 = 2000.
Let p2 = 100 and t2 = 10, so that p2t2 = 100*10 = 1000.
A = p1 + (t1% of p1) = 100 + (20% of 100) = 120.
B = p2 + (t2% of p2) = 100 + (10% of 100) = 110.
A>B.
Let p1 = 100 and t1 = 20, so that p1t1 = 100*20 = 2000.
Let p2 = 110 and t2 = 10, so that p2t2 = 110*10 = 1100.
A = p1 + (t1% of p1) = 100 + (20% of 100) = 120.
B = p2 + (t2% of p2) = 110 + (10% of 110) = 121.
A<B.
Since A>B in the first case and A<B in the second case, insufficient.
Statements 1 and 2 together:
The combinations used under statement 2 also satisfy statement 1, since in each case t1 > t2.
Thus, even when both statements are satisfied, it is possible that A>B and that A<B.
Insufficient.
The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- force5
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:48 am
- Thanked: 61 times
- Followed by:6 members
- GMAT Score:740
yes brother there can be several ways to do this question. And in fact an analysis can also solve this problem. however you can try which ever way is comfortable
we need relations between t1 and t2 & p1 and p2.
total cost would be p1(1+t1/100), p2(1+t2/100)
so .p1(1+t1/100)> p2(1+t2/100) ??
stmnt1- gives the relation between taxes, no info about p. so not sufficient
stmnt2- p1t1 > p2t2 not sufficient.
combining still not sufficient. problem is that we still don't know if P1 is greater than P2 or not.
hence E
if we take two statements together, there are still two possibilities.
So E.
we need relations between t1 and t2 & p1 and p2.
total cost would be p1(1+t1/100), p2(1+t2/100)
so .p1(1+t1/100)> p2(1+t2/100) ??
stmnt1- gives the relation between taxes, no info about p. so not sufficient
stmnt2- p1t1 > p2t2 not sufficient.
combining still not sufficient. problem is that we still don't know if P1 is greater than P2 or not.
hence E
if we take two statements together, there are still two possibilities.
So E.