BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Club DS question

Expert replies
by jsasipriya » Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:15 pm
If a, b , and c are positive distinct integers, is (a/b)/c an integer?

1. c=2
2. a=b+c

OA B

Explanation provided is:

"There is no combination that would allow divisibility into an integer for distinct integers such as a ,b and c ."

Statement 2. I picked numbers. a=6; b=2; c =3. This combination yields integer value. However, when a=6; b=4; c=3 this combination yields a fraction value. Hence I decided B is insufficient. And my answer was wrong.

Can someone explain this?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:46 pm
jsasipriya wrote:If a, b , and c are positive distinct integers, is (a/b)/c an integer?

1. c=2
2. a=b+c

OA B

Explanation provided is:

"There is no combination that would allow divisibility into an integer for distinct integers such as a ,b and c ."

Statement 2. I picked numbers. a=6; b=2; c =3. This combination yields integer value. However, when a=6; b=4; c=3 this combination yields a fraction value. Hence I decided B is insufficient. And my answer was wrong.

Can someone explain this?
Question rephrased: Is a/bc an integer?

Statement 1: c=2.
No information about a and b.
Insufficient.

Statement 2: a=b+c.
a/bc = (b+c)/bc = b/bc + c/bc = 1/c + 1/b.
If b=2 and c=2, then 1/c + 1/b = 1/2 + 1/2 = 1.
No other combination will result in an integer value for 1/c + 1/b.
Since b and c must be distinct, 1/c + 1/b -- and thus a/bc -- cannot be an integer.
Sufficient.

The correct answer is B.

The values that you plugged in do not satisfy the condition that a = b+c:

You plugged in a=6, b=2, c=3:
6 = 2+3. Doesn't work.

You plugged in a=6, b=4, c=3.
6 = 4+3. Doesn't work.

The values that you plug in must satisfy the statement that you are evaluating.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by rohu27 » Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:46 pm
jsasipriya wrote:If a, b , and c are positive distinct integers, is (a/b)/c an integer?

1. c=2
2. a=b+c

OA B

Explanation provided is:

"There is no combination that would allow divisibility into an integer for distinct integers such as a ,b and c ."

Statement 2. I picked numbers. a=6; b=2; c =3. This combination yields integer value. However, when a=6; b=4; c=3 this combination yields a fraction value. Hence I decided B is insufficient. And my answer was wrong.

Can someone explain this?
I guess you interpreted the Q wrong, ac/b? it is a/bc as Mitch pointed out.
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Apr 05, 2011 11:03 am
jsasipriya wrote:If a, b , and c are positive distinct integers, is (a/b)/c an integer?

2. a=b+c

Statement 2. I picked numbers. a=6; b=2; c =3. This combination yields integer value. However, when a=6; b=4; c=3 this combination yields a fraction value. Hence I decided B is insufficient. And my answer was wrong.

Can someone explain this?
Hi,

Mitch's explanation is spot on (as usual), I just want to focus on the specific mistake you made, since it's probably the most common way that test takers go wrong in data sufficiency.

When you evaluate a statement, you must take its truth for granted. In other words, the only numbers that exist are the ones that agree with the statement.

So, when you pick numbers in DS, there are two key steps to follow:

1) pick numbers that are "legal" (i.e. they follow the rules laid down in the question stem and the statement);

and then

2) plug those numbers back into the original question.

For this particular question, we have a governing rule from the stem (a, b and c are positive distinct integers) and, when looking at statement (1), the equation provided.

Accordingly, the numbers you chose are illegal - they violate the law set out in statement (1). Illegal numbers provide neither a yes nor a no answer to the question - they merely don't exist for the purposes of the question.

This principle can be illustrated with a much simpler example:

Q: what's the value of x?

(1) x = 3

Now, when evaluating statement (1), do you think "well, what if x is 4 or 5 or 6?" Of course not - it's obvious that those numbers are inconsequential. Similarly, for the question you posted, since we KNOW that:

a = b + c

we have to ignore a = 6, b = 3 and c = 2, since those numbers don't go along with the stated law.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by jsasipriya » Tue Apr 05, 2011 4:09 pm
Thank you very much experts! Indeed, your explanation clarifies where I went wrong. I was too much into the problem that I ignored the parent condition "a=b+c"
Join the discussion