Defense attorneys

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 140
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:51 am
Location: India
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:3 members

Defense attorneys

by farooq » Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:54 pm
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

OA B
What is wrong with the original statement ?

can two conjunction but and if come together?
Regards,
Farooq Farooqui.
London. UK

It is your Attitude, not your Aptitude, that determines your Altitude.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 7:36 am

by noun » Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:23 pm
The problem is in the meaning of A. It tells that the perpetrators are attributing the bad behaviour to some allergy. But actually it should be the defence attorneys.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 6:49 am

by khushboo143 » Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:17 am
attributed to in B is the correct idiom