Aristotle wrote that a tyrant would be well advised to put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are more tolerant of unjust treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-rearing and pious. Moreover as most subjects believe that even the gods are on the side of the ruler, the subjects are less apt to move against him.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which Aristotle’s argument depends?
(A) The subjects of tyrannical rulers typically believe that there is a power other than the mortal.
(B) A tyrant cannot rule unless he has divine power on his side.
(C) The subjects of tyrannical rulers can rarely be fooled by appearances.
(D) Tyrants who are devoted to religion will not treat their subjects unjustly.
(E) For a tyrant, the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion is a more effective means of ruling than unjust treatment.
Aristotle
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:23 am
- Location: frankfurt
- GMAT Score:620
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 4:19 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
Answer here is C.
The passage implies that if a Tyrant puts on the appearance of being devoted to religion, it will benefit the tyrant in a variety of ways. The only way that the conclusion will be valid, however, is if the tyrant's followers actually believe that the Tyrant is devoted to religion. The passage never mentions this, though, and merely assumes that the followers will believe the Tyrant when the Tyrant puts on that appearance.
The passage implies that if a Tyrant puts on the appearance of being devoted to religion, it will benefit the tyrant in a variety of ways. The only way that the conclusion will be valid, however, is if the tyrant's followers actually believe that the Tyrant is devoted to religion. The passage never mentions this, though, and merely assumes that the followers will believe the Tyrant when the Tyrant puts on that appearance.
--Sean
I provide GMAT (verbal) tutoring in NYC, and over Skype/E-mail. Please contact [email protected] for further information, or if you have any questions at all.
I provide GMAT (verbal) tutoring in NYC, and over Skype/E-mail. Please contact [email protected] for further information, or if you have any questions at all.
- Kunal_gmat
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:59 am
- Thanked: 2 times
I agree with hashar. As the second line states:
"Subjects are more tolerant of unjust treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-rearing and pious"
Why would this be? Because there obviously has to be difference between God and a normal human being (mortals) in terms of the divine powers. Hence, they would respect a tyrant with God on his/her side.
"Subjects are more tolerant of unjust treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-rearing and pious"
Why would this be? Because there obviously has to be difference between God and a normal human being (mortals) in terms of the divine powers. Hence, they would respect a tyrant with God on his/her side.
- Kunal_gmat
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:59 am
- Thanked: 2 times
ssilver0210, I have some doubts regarding your explanation. (C) says
" The subjects of tyrannical rulers can rarely be fooled by appearances."
If they can rarely be fooled, that means putting up an appearance of uncommon devotion has a very slim chance of fooling them into believing that the tyrant has god on his/her side. Hence do not try putting up an appearance. This option may actually WEAKEN the argument very comprehensively .
" The subjects of tyrannical rulers can rarely be fooled by appearances."
If they can rarely be fooled, that means putting up an appearance of uncommon devotion has a very slim chance of fooling them into believing that the tyrant has god on his/her side. Hence do not try putting up an appearance. This option may actually WEAKEN the argument very comprehensively .
- karmayogi
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:19 pm
- Thanked: 27 times
- Followed by:1 members
IMO A. The options shows that the subjects believe in god or "a power other than the mortal."
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
--By Swami Vivekananda
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 9:12 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
Conclusion :
Subjects are more tolerant of unjust treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-rearing and pious.
the 'Moreover' part is again a premise..supporting the conclusion.
Is 'tyrant' the key word here..
As i understand a 'tyrant' almost always uses harsh and cruel treatment ... irrespective of whether he is god-fearing or not?
Now the key difference for subject is tyrant A who is religious and tyrant B who is not religious..
subjects are tolerant to A because he is religious and hence the subjects believe that he has more power?? Which gives us A.?
(A) The subjects of tyrannical rulers typically believe that there is a power other than the mortal.
BUT.
Just because they believe there is power beyond mortal does not mean i okay the unjust treatment.
(D) Tyrants who are devoted to religion will not treat their subjects unjustly.
subjects are okay with the unjust treatment because the tyrants themselves do not treat the subjects unjustly if devoted to religion.
Negate this. tyrants devoted to religion will treat the subjects unjustly.. If this were the case...this means always he will treat the subjects unjustly which is not well taken by the subjects.
Not too sure which one to go with???
Subjects are more tolerant of unjust treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-rearing and pious.
the 'Moreover' part is again a premise..supporting the conclusion.
Is 'tyrant' the key word here..
As i understand a 'tyrant' almost always uses harsh and cruel treatment ... irrespective of whether he is god-fearing or not?
Now the key difference for subject is tyrant A who is religious and tyrant B who is not religious..
subjects are tolerant to A because he is religious and hence the subjects believe that he has more power?? Which gives us A.?
(A) The subjects of tyrannical rulers typically believe that there is a power other than the mortal.
BUT.
Just because they believe there is power beyond mortal does not mean i okay the unjust treatment.
(D) Tyrants who are devoted to religion will not treat their subjects unjustly.
subjects are okay with the unjust treatment because the tyrants themselves do not treat the subjects unjustly if devoted to religion.
Negate this. tyrants devoted to religion will treat the subjects unjustly.. If this were the case...this means always he will treat the subjects unjustly which is not well taken by the subjects.
Not too sure which one to go with???
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:23 am
- Location: frankfurt
- GMAT Score:620
Well the OA is A
Thanks guys for the explanations!
Thanks guys for the explanations!
Aëtou gēras, korydou neotēs.
"An eagle's old age (is worth) a sparrow's youth".
"An eagle's old age (is worth) a sparrow's youth".
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:52 am
(A) The subjects of tyrannical rulers typically believe that there is a power other than the mortal. Correct. Subjects believe in God. Only if subjects believe in god, can they be fooled.
(B) A tyrant cannot rule unless he has divine power on his side. : Just says likely
(C) The subjects of tyrannical rulers can rarely be fooled by appearances. : Quite opposite. This cannot be an assumption. If inserted into the argument, conclusion will fail
(D) Tyrants who are devoted to religion will not treat their subjects unjustly. : un-related
(E) For a tyrant, the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion is a more effective means of ruling than unjust treatment. : Adding this assumption does not affect conclusion at all. We do not know if the tyrant really wants to rule or just do an unjust treatment. His intentions are irrelevant.
(B) A tyrant cannot rule unless he has divine power on his side. : Just says likely
(C) The subjects of tyrannical rulers can rarely be fooled by appearances. : Quite opposite. This cannot be an assumption. If inserted into the argument, conclusion will fail
(D) Tyrants who are devoted to religion will not treat their subjects unjustly. : un-related
(E) For a tyrant, the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion is a more effective means of ruling than unjust treatment. : Adding this assumption does not affect conclusion at all. We do not know if the tyrant really wants to rule or just do an unjust treatment. His intentions are irrelevant.