Isotopes in the recently excavated bones of a 14-year-old girl from the Jamestown archaeological site indicate that she had eaten a high-protein diet, so was probably the daughter of a gentleman, not a maidservant.
(A) that she had eaten a high-protein diet, so was probably the daughter of a gentleman, not a maidservant
(B) that she ate a high protein diet, so probably had been the daughter of a gentleman, and not a maidservant
(C) that she had eaten a high protein diet, so was probably the daughter of a gentleman, and not a maidservant’s
(D) she ate a high-protein diet, so was probably the daughter of a gentleman, and had not been a maidservant
(E) she had eaten a high-protein diet, thereby had probably been the daughter of a gentleman, not a maidservant’s
OA A
Source: Veritas Prep
Isotopes in the recently excavated bones of a 14-year-old girl from the Jamestown archaeological site indicate that she
This topic has expert replies
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7187
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
- Followed by:23 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
The sentence explains that the isotopes in the recently excavated bones of a 14-year old girl indicated what she had eaten and probably her class in society.
Option A - correct
it correctly explains the logical meaning of the sentence using the proper structures required by the sentence.
Option B - incorrect
This sentence explains that she was the daughter of a gentleman, AND not a maidservant (as if she was both persons at the same time).
Option C - incorrect
It has the same issue as option B. It also creates two separate persons for the 14-years old girl.
Option D - incorrect
This answer choice gives an incorrect representation of time on the sentence "she had not been a maidservant," which basically means she did something before she was a daughter.
Option E - incorrect
This option has an illogical past perfect form of the verb 'had been' after thereby and incorrectly uses the possessive at the end, creating a non-parallel structure that is incorrect.
Option A - correct
it correctly explains the logical meaning of the sentence using the proper structures required by the sentence.
Option B - incorrect
This sentence explains that she was the daughter of a gentleman, AND not a maidservant (as if she was both persons at the same time).
Option C - incorrect
It has the same issue as option B. It also creates two separate persons for the 14-years old girl.
Option D - incorrect
This answer choice gives an incorrect representation of time on the sentence "she had not been a maidservant," which basically means she did something before she was a daughter.
Option E - incorrect
This option has an illogical past perfect form of the verb 'had been' after thereby and incorrectly uses the possessive at the end, creating a non-parallel structure that is incorrect.