If p+q is a multiple of 35, where p and q are positive integers p=?
1. when p is divided by 5, the remainder is 1.
2. when q is divided by 7, the remainder is 3.
Answer : [spoiler]C/E[/spoiler]
Very tough reminder
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Please be careful when you post; there's clearly information missing from this question, since x is completely unconnected to p, q and the two statements.maihuna wrote:If p+q is a multiple of 35, where p and q are positive integers x=?
1. when p is divided by 5, the remainder is 1.
2. when q is divided by 7, the remainder is 3.
Answer : C
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
- Thanked: 82 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
Ohh it was a typo Stuart, I have changed x to p the intended question. Now proceedStuart Kovinsky wrote:Please be careful when you post; there's clearly information missing from this question, since x is completely unconnected to p, q and the two statements.maihuna wrote:If p+q is a multiple of 35, where p and q are positive integers x=?
1. when p is divided by 5, the remainder is 1.
2. when q is divided by 7, the remainder is 3.
Answer : C
Charged up again to beat the beast
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
- Thanked: 82 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
any taker for this...maihuna wrote:If p+q is a multiple of 35, where p and q are positive integers p=?
1. when p is divided by 5, the remainder is 1.
2. when q is divided by 7, the remainder is 3.
Answer : C
Charged up again to beat the beast
P+Q=35,70
I. possible values of P = 6,11,16,21,26,31,36 not Sufficient
II. possible values of Q= 3,10,17,24,30,38 Not Sufficient
I&II, Since the sum of P+Q must be a multiple of 35 The only value of P and Q that Add up to 35 is P= 11 and Q=24...
So I choose C
I. possible values of P = 6,11,16,21,26,31,36 not Sufficient
II. possible values of Q= 3,10,17,24,30,38 Not Sufficient
I&II, Since the sum of P+Q must be a multiple of 35 The only value of P and Q that Add up to 35 is P= 11 and Q=24...
So I choose C
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
- Thanked: 82 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
There are several other pairs with P = 11 itseld, (11, 24) (11,59) (11, 94)Giorgio wrote:P+Q=35,70
I. possible values of P = 6,11,16,21,26,31,36 not Sufficient
II. possible values of Q= 3,10,17,24,30,38 Not Sufficient
I&II, Since the sum of P+Q must be a multiple of 35 The only value of P and Q that Add up to 35 is P= 11 and Q=24...
So I choose C
How I can be sure there is no other pairing possible with P other than 11.?
I highly doubt there is some subtle math tricks involve to close it within 2-minutes in an exam scenario.
Charged up again to beat the beast
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Not sure where the question is from, but the answer is definitely E, not C.maihuna wrote:There are several other pairs with P = 11 itseld, (11, 24) (11,59) (11, 94)Giorgio wrote:P+Q=35,70
I. possible values of P = 6,11,16,21,26,31,36 not Sufficient
II. possible values of Q= 3,10,17,24,30,38 Not Sufficient
I&II, Since the sum of P+Q must be a multiple of 35 The only value of P and Q that Add up to 35 is P= 11 and Q=24...
So I choose C
How I can be sure there is no other pairing possible with P other than 11.?
I highly doubt there is some subtle math tricks involve to close it within 2-minutes in an exam scenario.
If you understand remainders, it's actually a very quick question (under 30 seconds).
Remainders go in cycles, all the way up to infinity. Since we have every positive number in the universe at our disposal, there will be an infinite number of solutions, even when we take both statements into account.
So, as soon as we see that p+q fits a cycle (35, 70, 105, 140, ....), we know that there are an infinite number of possible values for p+q.
1) p = {1, 6, 11, 16, 21, ...} we have an infinite number of possible values for p, don't know anything about q: insufficient.
2) q = {3, 10, 17, 24, 31, ...} we have an infinite number of possible values for q, don't know anything about p: insufficient.
Combined: we have an infinite number of possible values for p AND an infinite number of possible values for q AND an infinite number of possible values for p+q; there will be an infinite number of points of intersection: insufficient, choose E.
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
- Thanked: 82 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
Hi Stuart,Stuart Kovinsky wrote:Not sure where the question is from, but the answer is definitely E, not C.maihuna wrote:There are several other pairs with P = 11 itseld, (11, 24) (11,59) (11, 94)Giorgio wrote:P+Q=35,70
I. possible values of P = 6,11,16,21,26,31,36 not Sufficient
II. possible values of Q= 3,10,17,24,30,38 Not Sufficient
I&II, Since the sum of P+Q must be a multiple of 35 The only value of P and Q that Add up to 35 is P= 11 and Q=24...
So I choose C
How I can be sure there is no other pairing possible with P other than 11.?
I highly doubt there is some subtle math tricks involve to close it within 2-minutes in an exam scenario.
If you understand remainders, it's actually a very quick question (under 30 seconds).
Remainders go in cycles, all the way up to infinity. Since we have every positive number in the universe at our disposal, there will be an infinite number of solutions, even when we take both statements into account.
So, as soon as we see that p+q fits a cycle (35, 70, 105, 140, ....), we know that there are an infinite number of possible values for p+q.
1) p = {1, 6, 11, 16, 21, ...} we have an infinite number of possible values for p, don't know anything about q: insufficient.
2) q = {3, 10, 17, 24, 31, ...} we have an infinite number of possible values for q, don't know anything about p: insufficient.
Combined: we have an infinite number of possible values for p AND an infinite number of possible values for q AND an infinite number of possible values for p+q; there will be an infinite number of points of intersection: insufficient, choose E.
can u please provide a suitable mathematical framework to close such Q quickly.?
Last edited by maihuna on Sun Dec 27, 2009 6:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Charged up again to beat the beast
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
There is no quick way to solve this algebraically; it's far far faster to either pick numbers to show that there's more than 1 possible answer or to understand the concepts to see that there are an infinite number of possibilities.maihuna wrote: Hi Stuart,
can u please provide a suitable mathematical framework to close such Q quickly.?
I suppose you could set up equations to show that you don't have enough information to solve the system:
p + q = 35k
p/5 = m + 1
q/7 = n + 3
in which k is a positive integer and m and n are non-negative integers.
We have 3 equations and 5 unknowns, so there's no way to solve for p.
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
- Thanked: 82 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
Hi Stuart,Stuart Kovinsky wrote:There is no quick way to solve this algebraically; it's far far faster to either pick numbers to show that there's more than 1 possible answer or to understand the concepts to see that there are an infinite number of possibilities.maihuna wrote: Hi Stuart,
can u please provide a suitable mathematical framework to close such Q quickly.?
I suppose you could set up equations to show that you don't have enough information to solve the system:
p + q = 35k
p/5 = m + 1
q/7 = n + 3
in which k is a positive integer and m and n are non-negative integers.
We have 3 equations and 5 unknowns, so there's no way to solve for p.
But the dangerous part is that remainders follow a pattern some time and most of the tough questions are solved just because they only allow a few options that match the given crietrion.
Charged up again to beat the beast
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
I'm not sure what you mean.maihuna wrote:
Hi Stuart,
But the dangerous part is that remainders follow a pattern some time and most of the tough questions are solved just because they only allow a few options that match the given crietrion.
Remainders always follow a pattern. In problem solving, we can use those patterns to narrow down the choices; in data sufficiency, we can use those patterns to determine the sufficiency of the statements.
I'm not suggesting that we should always say "this is a remainder question, so the answer is E"; of course it depends on what the question is asking (which is why it's imperative to understand the question before evaluating the statements).
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
- viidyasagar
- Community Manager
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:06 am
- Location: Mumbai, India
- Thanked: 16 times
- Followed by:3 members
- GMAT Score:700
Dear All...question asks for unique p...not for unique p and q....hence be careful about
p=11 q=24 p+q=35
p=11 q=59 p+q=70
no unique answers , therefore E
We have 3 equations and 5 unknowns hence unsolvable mathematically...as Stuart rightly pointed out...
p=11, q = 59.... p+q = 70
p = 81, q = 59... p+q = 140.... no unique value of p, hence E
p=11 q=24 p+q=35
p=11 q=59 p+q=70
no unique answers , therefore E
We have 3 equations and 5 unknowns hence unsolvable mathematically...as Stuart rightly pointed out...
p=11, q = 59.... p+q = 70
p = 81, q = 59... p+q = 140.... no unique value of p, hence E
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
- Thanked: 82 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
I think stuart and others even did not got my core emphasis, reminders short of things are having certain structure and so do not require as many equation as that many variables, take for example, integer solutions for 3 variables can be constructed using one equation only, add some constraints and even unique values can be found,viidyasagar wrote:Dear All...question asks for unique p...not for unique p and q....hence be careful about
p=11 q=24 p+q=35
p=11 q=59 p+q=70
no unique answers , therefore E
We have 3 equations and 5 unknowns hence unsolvable mathematically...as Stuart rightly pointed out...
p=11, q = 59.... p+q = 70
p = 81, q = 59... p+q = 140.... no unique value of p, hence E
Point that I was trying to make was: In exam I tried to make a table and coudn't see a combination other than p=11 for almost a dozen value, as we normally do assume GMAT pattern do not change much later, I assumed it is uniques,
So what we need is a formulatic version or a quick way to find values will not be or will be unique.
The variable/equation based conclusion, as suggested, is absurd, in case you have understood my concern.
Charged up again to beat the beast
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:32 pm
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:1 members
P's possibilities, 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56..
Q's possibilities: 3 10 17 24 31 38 45 52 59 66 73 ...
35 multiples, 35, 70, 105, 140 ...
Check all the P+Q 5 multiples.
11+24 = 35 YES
16+24 = 40 NO
24 + 26 = 50 NO
24+ 36 = 60 NO
.
.
.
46 + 59 = 105 YES
Since we are getting more than 2 values, the answer should be E.
Q's possibilities: 3 10 17 24 31 38 45 52 59 66 73 ...
35 multiples, 35, 70, 105, 140 ...
Check all the P+Q 5 multiples.
11+24 = 35 YES
16+24 = 40 NO
24 + 26 = 50 NO
24+ 36 = 60 NO
.
.
.
46 + 59 = 105 YES
Since we are getting more than 2 values, the answer should be E.
What we think, we become