BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Most expenditures to combat such vector-borne diseases

Expert replies
by aditya8062 » Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:22 am
Most expenditures to combat such vector-borne diseases like malaria and rabies have focused either on the immunization of humans or on obliterating the carriers with pesticides.

A like malaria and rabies have focused either on the immunization of humans or on obliterating
B like malaria and dengue have focused either on immunization of humans or on the obliteration of
C as malaria and dengue have focused on either immunizing humans or on obliterating
D as malaria and dengue have focused on either immunizing of humans or on obliteration of
E as malaria and dengue have focused on either immunizing humans or obliterating

i somewhat wary about this question .i was forced to select E in this this but i feel that parallelism is not that oki in E
i feel that the perfect answer would have been as follows :as malaria and dengue have focused either on immunization of humans or on the obliteration of
the reason i don't feel oki about E is because of the expression "immunizing humans" ---> it seems to indicate a type of humans !! i strongly feel that the correct phrasing should have been "immunization of humans"
kindly tell me guru if my logic is correct
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ceilidh.erickson » Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:43 am
This problem tests two topics: IDIOMS and PARALLELISM.

The structure SUCH vector-borne diseases LIKE malaria and rabies is not idiomatically correct. We need to say SUCH... AS. Eliminate A and B.

You're correct that C, D, and E involve parallelism with EITHER / OR. Be careful, though! Just because the correct answer didn't say exactly what you wanted it to say, that doesn't make it wrong. All of the following would be correct:

... have focused on immunizing humans or obliterating --> parallel gerunds
... have focused on immunizing humans or on obliterating --> parallel prepositional phrases
... have focused either on immunizing humans or on obliterating --> parallel prepositional phrases
... have focused on either immunizing humans or obliterating --> parallel gerunds

You're correct that either on X or on Y would have been parallel, but so is on either X or Y.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:48 am
In PARALLELISM, there is a difference between two-part parallel markers (either/or, not/but, etc) and one-part parallel markers (and, or, etc). For more on how to attack those, see:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/help-manhatt ... tml#713882
https://www.beatthegmat.com/think-of-x-a ... tml#575578
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by aditya8062 » Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:21 am
ceilidh.erickson ,with all due respect to you but i feel that my question is not answered . i know that there are two part parallel marker and one part parallel marker .
what i was specifically asking was about the expression "immunizing humans" .i am ,somehow , not feeling comfortable about this expression .
i feel the better expression is "immunization of humans"
also plz tell me if the correct expression to introduce example would be "such as" or "as" .i feel "such as" is better .but still can gmat question introduce examples with "as"



kindly tell me on this aspect
thanks and regards
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Fri Apr 18, 2014 9:06 am
I understand your confusion. In English, words ending in "-ing" can act as either nouns (in which case we call them gerunds) or modifiers (in which case we call them present participles). The context of the sentence determines which case we're looking at.

If we saw "the sleeping baby," then "sleeping" is telling us the type of baby. It does not have to be the case, though, that "immunizing humans" tells us the type of humans. When used with "on," it is understood that "immunizing" is a gerund, not a modifier. There is no significant difference between "immunizing humans" and "the immunization of humans." You or I might prefer the latter stylistically, but the former is not incorrect.

When introducing examples, you're right - the correct idiom is "such as." In this example, the expression was broken up: "such examples as." This is also correct.

We can't introduce examples simply with the word "as." We use "as" to compare clauses:
You like music, as do I.

or to express "in the manner of" or "in acting the part of":
As a teacher, I care about critical thinking.
As a woman, she was offended by the joke.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1