BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

State legislators

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:08 am
Thanked: 6 times

State legislators

by SmarpanGamt » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:08 am
State legislators fear that traffic accidents would be more frequent and severe if the speed limit was increased to 75 mph on rural highways.
(A) would be more frequent and severe if the speed limit was increased
(B) would be more frequent and severe were the speed limit to be increased up
(C) would be more frequent and severe were the speed limit increased
(D) would become more frequent and severe with the speed limit increased
(E) would become more frequent and severe after the speed limit has increased


Please explain each of the choice. OA is C.
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:38 pm
Thanked: 127 times
Followed by:14 members

by gmat_perfect » Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:10 am
SmarpanGamt wrote:State legislators fear that traffic accidents would be more frequent and severe if the speed limit was increased to 75 mph on rural highways.
(A) would be more frequent and severe if the speed limit was increased
(B) would be more frequent and severe were the speed limit to be increased up
(C) would be more frequent and severe were the speed limit increased
(D) would become more frequent and severe with the speed limit increased
(E) would become more frequent and severe after the speed limit has increased

Please explain each of the choice. OA is C.
See the following sentences:

If I were rich, i would help the poor.

--> I would help the poor if I were rich.
--> I would help the poor were I rich.

Were it X == If it were X

Since "would become" signals subjunctive, we should think about the option which uses "sub + were".

There are two ways to write the "subject + Were":

1. If it were X.
2. Were it X..

We will prefer if it were.

See the options.

A. It uses "if X was". No, it should be if it were.
B. Uses the correct version "were it x", but "were it to be" is not correct.
C. Correct.
D and E: the second portion does not have "if clause/were it". so, none of the options is compatible with the sentence.

Answer is C.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 4:00 am
Thanked: 2 times

by simone88 » Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:24 am
I understand B is correct. But why is D wrong? I mean, "with the speed limit increaded accidents would be more frequent". I cannot see any problem even if were is not used.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:31 pm
Thanked: 42 times
Followed by:20 members

by sana.noor » Fri Mar 22, 2013 4:03 am
Its "if, then" construction.."If"hypothetical Subjunctive and "then" conditional"
the right consturction is "would be more freuqent...If speed limit were increased to"
A is worng because it uses WAS
B is wrong because "speed limit TO BE increased UP" is wrong increase up is totally wrong
D is out because Would become more frequent WITH the speed limit increased" is again wrong construction
E is out because it uses wrong construction "has increased"

C is the right option.
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 123
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 2:34 am
Location: Bengaluru, India
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:9 members

by Gowri@CrackVerbal » Sun Mar 24, 2013 9:55 pm
SmarpanGamt wrote:State legislators fear that traffic accidents would be more frequent and severe if the speed limit was increased to 75 mph on rural highways.
(A) would be more frequent and severe if the speed limit was increased
(B) would be more frequent and severe were the speed limit to be increased up
(C) would be more frequent and severe were the speed limit increased
(D) would become more frequent and severe with the speed limit increased
(E) would become more frequent and severe after the speed limit has increased


Please explain each of the choice. OA is C.
There are 2 events in action here in the following order:
1. The speed limit is increased
2. Traffic accidents increase in frequency and severity
The use of 'would' indicates that this situation is hypothetical: if the speed limit were to be increased, the frequency/severity of traffic accidents would increase.

we use 'with' to describe 2 simultaneous actions. For e.g.
She walked out of the room with her head held high.
D is incorrect because it uses 'with' to describe two non-simultaneous actions.

There is a tense mismatch in E: 'would increase' and 'has increased'. Secondly, 'has increased' seems to imply that the speed limit has somehow increased on its own. For e.g.
Summer temperatures in Bali have increased.

In the right answer choice C, 'were the speed limit increased to X..." indicates that there is an element of intent and action here. i.e. the state legislators are the ones who increase the speed limit.
Gowri N Kishore
Verbal Specialist & Mentor
CrackVerbal

If you find my posts useful, please hit the 'Thank' button. :)

Get a FREE Profile Evaluation from CrackVerbal experts!
https://applications.crackverbal.com/fre ... valuation/

Attend Live, Instructor-led Online classes by 99th p'cile instructors!
https://gmat.crackverbal.com/gmat-course ... ve-course/
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1