To process waste more efficiently, the city of Hayfield plan

This topic has expert replies
Moderator
Posts: 772
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:29 pm
Followed by:6 members

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

To process waste more efficiently, the city of Hayfield plans to revise disposal methods for residual waste, which is waste from households that contains recyclable materials that have not yet been processed separately. Residual waste typically contains a mixture of biodegradable materials as well as hazardous toxins. Hayfield plans to use the latest waste-to-energy technology to convert the biodegradable materials from residual waste into energy, thereby making the most efficient use of such waste products.

Which of the following most strengthens the given plan?

A) The quantity of residual waste generated by the city is greater than that of any other kind of waste.
B) Biodegradable materials consist of over three-fifths of the total annual amount of residual waste in Hayfield.
C) Toxins found in waste products are not indistinguishable from non-toxic materials.
D) The latest waste-to-energy technology can also be used to recycle discarded materials other than residual waste.
E) The amount of waste generated by Hayfield's industrial regions is among the highest anywhere in the country.

OA is c

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 9:08 pm

by Akrita@Jamboree » Thu Apr 05, 2018 2:02 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

BTGmoderatorRO wrote:To process waste more efficiently, the city of Hayfield plans to revise disposal methods for residual waste, which is waste from households that contains recyclable materials that have not yet been processed separately. Residual waste typically contains a mixture of biodegradable materials as well as hazardous toxins. Hayfield plans to use the latest waste-to-energy technology to convert the biodegradable materials from residual waste into energy, thereby making the most efficient use of such waste products.

Which of the following most strengthens the given plan?

A) The quantity of residual waste generated by the city is greater than that of any other kind of waste.
B) Biodegradable materials consist of over three-fifths of the total annual amount of residual waste in Hayfield.
C) Toxins found in waste products are not indistinguishable from non-toxic materials.
D) The latest waste-to-energy technology can also be used to recycle discarded materials other than residual waste.
E) The amount of waste generated by Hayfield's industrial regions is among the highest anywhere in the country.
OA is c
why is C the correct answer? any explanation?
I am happy to help. This is a Plan question type. In a Plan question, the GMAT will give us a plan and ask us to Weaken/Strengthen the plan. In all Plan questions, the most crucial step is to identify the Objective/Goal for which the plan is designed. Once the goal is identified, there are 2 ways to strengthen a plan, namely:

1.show that the plan would meet the goal/objective
2.show that the plan can be easily implemented

To weaken a plan, we have to show that the plan wouldn't meet its objective.

In this case, our plan and goal are as follows:

Plan: Use the latest waste-to-energy technology to convert the biodegradable materials from residual waste into energy
Goal: Make the most efficient use of residual waste

Seems like a great plan! Convert the residual waste into energy using the latest state-of-the-art technology. However, as is the case in any CR question, we want to think about what could be a potential flaw/problem with this plan? Well, we want to make the most efficient use of residual waste - however, we want to convert only the biodegradable component to energy. The problem with residual waste is that it typically contains a mixture of biodegradable waste AND TOXINS! Presumably, we wouldn't want to convert toxins to energy - this would be a totally futile, possibly life-threatening use of residual waste.

Therefore, in order to make the most efficient use of the waste, we have to be able to separate the biodegradable part from the toxic part since we are really interested in converting ONLY the biodegradable component to energy. This is what Option C addresses.

C. Toxins found in waste products are not indistinguishable from non-toxic materials - A double negation - 'not indistinguishable' - is one of GMAT's favorite constructions on the higher-level CR and RC questions. Always change a double negation to an affirmative - it is much easier to comprehend the sentence. Option C essentially reads "Toxins found in waste products are distinguishable from non-toxic materials". In other words, we can use the technology to identify and convert only the BIODEGRADABLE component.

Let us go through the other options:
A) The quantity of residual waste generated by the city is greater than that of any other kind of waste - Good, but will we be able to make efficient use of this residual waste? This option doesn't address this question. Eliminate
B) Biodegradable materials consist of over three-fifths of the total annual amount of residual waste in Hayfield - Same as A. Eliminate
D) The latest waste-to-energy technology can also be used to recycle discarded materials other than residual waste - Out of scope; Waste other than residual waste is beyond the argument. Eliminate
E) The amount of waste generated by Hayfield's industrial regions is among the highest anywhere in the country - Same as A. Eliminate

Hence, C is the correct answer.

Please let me know in case anything doesn't make sense.

GMAT/MBA Expert

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:53 am

by Jake@ThePrincetonReview » Tue Apr 10, 2018 1:39 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Hi there!
I would add to the previous post by saying that another way to strengthen a plan is to remove a possible weakness. It's addition by subtraction! You're strengthening the plan by eliminating a potential problem with the plan.

So in this case, we see an answer written in the negative (e.g. X will NOT happen), which generally prompts me to think, "Hmmm. Is what this answer saying will NOT happen actually a potential problem/weakness in the plan?" And in this case it is. If the city cannot distinguish biodegradable material from toxic hazardous material, then the city won't be able to effectively recycle it only the biodegradable parts. Right? You can't turn toxic materials into anything useful. So this answer choice does indeed remove a possible weakness and thus fits the profile of a correct answer.

Bottom line: For strengthen Q's, look for answer choices worded in the negative as possibilities to strengthen by removing a possible weakness.
Bonus tip: This method of thinking applies to causal arguments as well. Sometimes, you can strengthen a causal argument by removing a possible alternate cause.




Image
Jake Schiff
GMAT Instructor and Master Trainer
Image
Curious How You'll Score? Take a FREE GMAT® practice test or sample class
Ready to Prep? Exclusive discounts for Beat The GMAT® members HERE