Q1) Is [x^2] = 9 ?
(1) [x] = 3
(2) [x^3] = 27
where [x] represents rounding off to nearest integer.
Q2) A cube of edge 6 cm is painted with red on one face. If the cube is then uniformly sliced into 216 cubes of equal volume (edge 1 cm), how many small cubes have colored edges.
Super Tough 51 level problems - Experts please help
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 9:13 am
- Thanked: 1 times
Last edited by gmattaker20 on Wed Aug 01, 2012 4:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
- niketdoshi123
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:24 pm
- Thanked: 62 times
- Followed by:3 members
9 <= x^2 < 10gmattaker20 wrote:Q1) Is [x^2] = 9 ?
(1) [x] = 3
(2) [x^3] = 27
where [x] represents rounding off to integer.
Take square root of all the values : 3 <= x < 3.16
So rephrase the question
Is 3<= x < 3.16 ( You don't have to calculate the exact value of _/10; approximating its value would solve the purpose)
Statement 1:INSUFFICIENT
Range : 3 <= x < 4
Since x can be greater than or less than 3.16 , the statement is insufficient
Statement 2:SUFFICIENT
Range : 27 <= x^3 < 28
Take cube root , the new range : 3 <= x < 3.05(approx), this is definitely in the range of what the question asks.
Hence the answer is B
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:43 am
- Location: London
- Thanked: 2 times
- GMAT Score:760
Q1. This seems a little ambiguous -- does [x] mean rounding down, or rounding to the nearest? I'm assuming the latter in my solution.
(1) implies that 2.5<=x<3.5. Therefore 6.25<=x^2<12.25, and so [x^2] can be 6,7,8,9,10,11, or 12. INSUFFICIENT.
(2) implies that 26.5<=x^3<27.5. This is trickier, because we can't sensibly try and work out the cube root of 26.5 or 27.5. The key insight is that, if x is approximately 3, the "gap" between x and 3 will increase as x is raised to a positive whole number power. (Statement 1 illustrates this). Therefore the gap between x^3 and 27 will get smaller for x and x^2 -- so we know that for the latter, the gap will be less than 0.5, and hence x^2 will round to 9. SUFFICIENT.
Answer: B
Q2. This seems more straightforward. The larger cube is made of 6x6x6 smaller ones. Hence a single edge of the former will be shared by exactly 6 of the latter.
Answer: 6
(1) implies that 2.5<=x<3.5. Therefore 6.25<=x^2<12.25, and so [x^2] can be 6,7,8,9,10,11, or 12. INSUFFICIENT.
(2) implies that 26.5<=x^3<27.5. This is trickier, because we can't sensibly try and work out the cube root of 26.5 or 27.5. The key insight is that, if x is approximately 3, the "gap" between x and 3 will increase as x is raised to a positive whole number power. (Statement 1 illustrates this). Therefore the gap between x^3 and 27 will get smaller for x and x^2 -- so we know that for the latter, the gap will be less than 0.5, and hence x^2 will round to 9. SUFFICIENT.
Answer: B
Q2. This seems more straightforward. The larger cube is made of 6x6x6 smaller ones. Hence a single edge of the former will be shared by exactly 6 of the latter.
Answer: 6
London-based private tutor
www.gmatprolondon.com
www.gmatprolondon.com
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 9:13 am
- Thanked: 1 times
Thanks for the explanations, willrc.
In Q1 it is rounding to the nearest integer. Your assumption is correct.
As for the second question, I am sorry I made a typo. It is face instead of edge. I have edited in the original post also.
Q2) A cube of edge 6 cm is painted with red on one FACE. If the cube is then uniformly sliced into 216 cubes of equal volume (edge 1 cm), how many small cubes have colored edges.
In Q1 it is rounding to the nearest integer. Your assumption is correct.
I couldn't comprehend this explanation. Could you please try to make it less dense.(2) implies that 26.5<=x^3<27.5. This is trickier, because we can't sensibly try and work out the cube root of 26.5 or 27.5. The key insight is that, if x is approximately 3, the "gap" between x and 3 will increase as x is raised to a positive whole number power. (Statement 1 illustrates this). Therefore the gap between x^3 and 27 will get smaller for x and x^2 -- so we know that for the latter, the gap will be less than 0.5, and hence x^2 will round to 9. SUFFICIENT.
As for the second question, I am sorry I made a typo. It is face instead of edge. I have edited in the original post also.
Q2) A cube of edge 6 cm is painted with red on one FACE. If the cube is then uniformly sliced into 216 cubes of equal volume (edge 1 cm), how many small cubes have colored edges.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Question rephrased: Is 8.5 ≤ x² < 9.5?gmattaker20 wrote:Q1) Is [x^2] = 9 ?
(1) [x] = 3
(2) [x^3] = 27
where [x] represents rounding off to nearest integer.
Statement 1: [x] = 3.
Thus, 2.5 ≤ x < 3.5.
If x=3, then x²=9.
In this case, 8.5 ≤ x² < 9.5.
If x=2.5, then x²=6.25.
In this case, it is not true that 8.5 ≤ x² < 9.5.
INSUFFICIENT.
Statement 2: [x^3] = 27.
Thus, 26.5 ≤ x³ < 27.5.
Rephrase this range and the question stem range in terms of a COMMON POWER so that it's easier to compare them.
Questions stem range:
17/2 ≤ x² < 19/2
(17/2)³ ≤ x� < (19/2)³
17³/8 ≤ x� < 19³/8
17³ ≤ 8x� < 19³
4913 ≤ 8x� < 6589.
Statement 2 range:
53/2 ≤ x³ < 55/2
(53/2)² ≤ x� < (55/2)²
53²/4 ≤ x� < 55²/4
2(53²)/8 ≤ x� < 2(55²)/8
2(53²) ≤ 8x� < 2(55²)
5618 ≤ 8x� < 6050.
Since the range in statement 2 is NARROWER, every value that satisfies statement 2 is within the question stem range.
SUFFICIENT.
The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 9:13 am
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 12:03 pm
- Location: New York, USA
- Thanked: 34 times
- Followed by:1 members
Solution to Question 02:
Imagine the cube as one having 6 layers of 1cm height each. Now, in order that the given condition of breaking the larger cube up into 216 equal cubes be satisfied, each layer must have 216/6 = 36 cubes of 1*1*1 cm each.
Therefore, 36 cubes will be red faced.
But this does not seem like a GMAT question!
Imagine the cube as one having 6 layers of 1cm height each. Now, in order that the given condition of breaking the larger cube up into 216 equal cubes be satisfied, each layer must have 216/6 = 36 cubes of 1*1*1 cm each.
Therefore, 36 cubes will be red faced.
But this does not seem like a GMAT question!