BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

number properties

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by sud21 » Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:29 pm
x-y>0, x>y

St.(1) (x-y)/y>0 , x can be both positive and negative and can be a fraction.y can be both positive or negative. x=-1/2, y=1/3. x=1/2, y=1/3. Not sufficient.

St.(2) x=-3, y=-2. x=2, y=1.Not sufficient.

Ans. E
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sun Feb 19, 2012 11:16 pm
Is x-y>0? (Or x+y>0?)
1). x-y/x>0
2). x+y/x-y>0

Yes the correct answer is E. Both the statements cannot stand onto a common position...

When x and y both are negative and when x<y, both the given statements are or come out to be greater than 0 but it does not prove (x-y) > 0...

Hence the correct answer is E...


Hope this really helped...
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Join the discussion

by Whitney Garner » Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:19 am
sud21 wrote:Is x-y>0? (Or x+y>0?)
1). x-y/x>0
2). x+y/x-y>0
Hi Sud21!

I would love to hear the source for this problem because there are issues with the 2 Statements. When you solve them, you end up with contradictory information - something the GMAT will never do. I'm going to answer the question "Is x-y>0?" (not the other) but only to show what I mean about contradictory information. WARNING: Only use this question and its suggested solutions as a means to practice working with inequalities and data sufficiency - DO NOT use this problem as a true representation of a GMAT question because this does not meet standard GMAC rules. Always avoid questions that do not have clearly noted and reputable sources.

Rephrase the Question:
It might be easier to understand if we separate the x and y... "Is x>y?"
Now, when I'm trying to figure out if one value is greater than another in the world of inequalities, I will likely be setting up cases. So let's see what that means...

Statement 1: x-y/x>0
To simplify this we will need to multiply both sides by x so that means we have 2 cases (one where x>0 and one where x<0).

If x>0 --> x-y>x --> -y>0 --> 0>y
So when x>0, y<0... so y<0<x --> y<x

If x<0 --> x-y<x --> -y<0 --> 0<y
So when x<0, y>0... so x<0<y --> x<y

These are 2 different answers, so NOT sufficient.


Statement 2: x+y/x-y>0
To simplify this we will need to multiply both sides by (x-y) so that means we have 2 cases (one where (x-y)>0 and one where (x-y)<0).

If x-y>0 or x>y --> x+y>x-y --> y>-y --> 2y>0 --> y>0
So if x>y and y>0, then x>y>0 --> x>y

If x-y<0 or x<y --> x+y<x-y --> y<-y --> 2y<0 --> y<0
So when x<y, y<0... so x<y<0 --> x<y

These are 2 different answers, so NOT sufficient.


Statement 1+2:
Now comes the issue...from statement (1) we basically find out that x and y have opposite signs...so if x is positive, y is negative and x is greater, but if x is negative, y would be positive and therefore greater.

From Statement (2) we actually learn the opposite...x and y have the SAME sign, so if x is negative, so is y, but x is more negative (or less). If x were positive, however, y would also be positive but less positive (so x would be greater in this case). There is still no consistent answer (not sufficient)...BUT

The big point - these 2 statements cannot be true at the same time - I cannot have rules that simultaneously require x and y to have the same signs AND different signs.

On its face the question feels fairly GMAT-like but whoever wrote it did not pay careful enough attention to the GMAT rules. Therefore you should ALWAYS AVOID questions without clear and reputable sources!

:)
Whit
Whitney Garner
GMAT/GRE/EA Instructor & Anxiety/Accommodations Coach
www.whitneygarner.com

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Math is a lot like love - a simple idea that can easily get complicated :heart-eyes:
Join the discussion