sowell argues

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:58 am

sowell argues

by nh8404052006 » Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:18 am
By showing that South Africa does not have a free market and is in fact a kind of collectivist welfare state for Whites only, Sowell argues that American conservatives have no valid ideological grounds to be in sympathy with the Pretoria regime.
(A) to be in sympathy with
(B) to sympathize with
(C) for sympathizing with
(D) that they should sympathize with
(E) that they should have sympathy for


OA:C
IMO: B
SC 1000 Q190
Please explain thank

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:39 am

by Hopper39 » Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:46 am
I believe "grounds for..." is idiomatic.

Ex: "Grounds for dismissal".

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 84
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:04 am
Thanked: 3 times

by dgr8onerip » Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:46 am
even i think its B
plz explain anyone??

Legendary Member
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
Thanked: 12 times

by nervesofsteel » Thu Jan 22, 2009 1:24 am
Grounds for is the correct idiom

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 10:32 am
Location: Phoenix
Thanked: 1 times

by gkammaje » Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:52 am
(C)

Correct idiom - grounds for...

Also, showing ---- sympathizing is correct here