• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations
• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote ## Small Car Fuel Efficiency ##### This topic has 9 expert replies and 21 member replies Goto page Legendary Member Joined 25 Sep 2015 Posted: 651 messages Followed by: 5 members Upvotes: 14 GMATGuruNY wrote: TheGraduate wrote: C: Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars that are more fuel-efficient than those at any other time in production history. D: Today's technology allows manufacturers to make more fuel-efficient small cars than those at any other time in their production history. Apart from other errors, in D those is not essential to the construction while in C those is essential. Is that right? This line of reasoning is valid. Incorrect: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than those last year. Correct: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than last year. The correct version implies the following comparison: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than [it produced cars] last year. Dear Mitch, What does the incorrect version of your example above imply? ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 25 May 2010 Posted: 15204 messages Followed by: 1861 members Upvotes: 13060 GMAT Score: 790 TheGraduate wrote: Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their production history. A) small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their B) small cars that are more fuel-efficient than they were at any time in their D) more fuel-efficient small cars than those at any other time in their Please comment on pronoun ambiguity of "their" in (A),(D) and of "they" and "their" in (B). In A and D, it is unclear whether their serves to refer to manufacturers or to small cars. Eliminate A and D. Forms of they (they, them, their) cannot serve to compare TWO DIFFERENT SETS OF X. Incorrect: This year's cellphones are better than THEY were last year. Here, the usage of they implies that the SAME set of cellphones is being discussed in each instance. Not so. The intention is to compare ONE set of cellphones (this year's cellphones) to ANOTHER set of cellphones (last year's cellphones). Correct: This year's cellphones are better than last year's. B: small cars that are more fuel-efficient than they were at any time in their history Here, the intention is compare ONE set of cars (today's small cars) to ANOTHER set of cars (small cars produced in the past). Since forms of they cannot serve to compare two different sets of X, eliminate B. _________________ Mitch Hunt Private Tutor for the GMAT and GRE GMATGuruNY@gmail.com If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon. Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance. For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com. Student Review #1 Student Review #2 Student Review #3 Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Sun Apr 23, 2017 3:30 am; edited 1 time in total Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now. Legendary Member Joined 25 Sep 2015 Posted: 651 messages Followed by: 5 members Upvotes: 14 GMATGuruNY wrote: TheGraduate wrote: Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their production history. A) small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their B) small cars that are more fuel-efficient than they were at any time in their D) more fuel-efficient small cars than those at any other time in their Please comment on pronoun ambiguity of "their" in (A),(D) and of "they" and "their" in (B). In A and D, it is unclear whether their serves to refer to manufacturers or to small cars. Eliminate A and D. Forms of they (they, them, their) cannot serve to compare TWO DIFFERENT SETS OF X. Incorrect: This year's cellphones are better than THEY were last year. Here, the usage of they implies that the SAME set of cellphones is being discussed in each instance. Not so. The intention is to compare ONE set of cellphones (this year's cellphones) to ANOTHER set of cellphones (last year's cellphones). Correct: This year's cellphones are better than last year's. B: small cars that are more fuel-efficient than at any time in their history Here, the intention is compare ONE set of cars (today's small cars) to ANOTHER set of cars (small cars produced in the past). Since forms of they cannot serve to compare two different sets of X, eliminate B. You forget the 'they were' as appeared in the choice B above. ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 25 May 2010 Posted: 15204 messages Followed by: 1861 members Upvotes: 13060 GMAT Score: 790 Mo2men wrote: Quote: B: small cars that are more fuel-efficient than at any time in their history Here, the intention is compare ONE set of cars (today's small cars) to ANOTHER set of cars (small cars produced in the past). Since forms of they cannot serve to compare two different sets of X, eliminate B. You forget the 'they were' as appeared in the choice B above. Good catch. I've edited my response accordingly. _________________ Mitch Hunt Private Tutor for the GMAT and GRE GMATGuruNY@gmail.com If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon. Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance. For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com. Student Review #1 Student Review #2 Student Review #3 Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now. Legendary Member Joined 30 May 2012 Posted: 942 messages Followed by: 4 members Upvotes: 8 Hi, Can anyone please shed light on the SOURCE of this SC ? @Sorin/BTG: Can we NOT make it mandatory to mention the SOURCE while posting any Verbal Or Quant Qs in the forum ? Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Joined 02 Oct 2016 Posted: 77 messages Upvotes: 1 This question is from the GMATPrep default exam pack. ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 25 May 2010 Posted: 15204 messages Followed by: 1861 members Upvotes: 13060 GMAT Score: 790 Mo2men wrote: Quote: Incorrect: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than those last year. Dear Mitch, What does the incorrect version of your example above imply? It seems to imply the following nonsensical comparison: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than cars last year produced. _________________ Mitch Hunt Private Tutor for the GMAT and GRE GMATGuruNY@gmail.com If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon. Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance. For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com. Student Review #1 Student Review #2 Student Review #3 Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now. Legendary Member Joined 25 Sep 2015 Posted: 651 messages Followed by: 5 members Upvotes: 14 GMATGuruNY wrote: Mo2men wrote: Quote: Incorrect: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than those last year. Dear Mitch, What does the incorrect version of your example above imply? It seems to imply the following nonsensical comparison: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than cars last year produced. Thanks GMATGuru, Another two questions: 1- Can this version be correct? The manufacturer produced more cars this year than those last year by American manufacturers. 2- In the correct version: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than last year. The subject & verb are omitted but their presence are implied. However, can I omit the subject only and leave the verb? Is this ever a correct construction? Or should be both subject & verb omitted together or both appear together? My proposed version: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than produced last year. ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 25 May 2010 Posted: 15204 messages Followed by: 1861 members Upvotes: 13060 GMAT Score: 790 Mo2men wrote: Thanks GMATGuru, Another two questions: 1- Can this version be correct? The manufacturer produced more cars this year than those last year by American manufacturers. This sentence is not viable. In the second clause the omitted verb seems to be were produced (passive), while the verb in the first clause is produced (active). An omitted verb may not be in a different voice from that of the antecedent verb. Quote: However, can I omit the subject only and leave the verb? Is this ever a correct construction? Or should be both subject & verb omitted together or both appear together? My proposed version: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than produced last year. This sentence is not viable. Generally, if the second clause in a comparison includes a verb, then the subject in the second clause may not be omitted. It is quite common, however, for the second clause in a comparison to include a subject but omit the verb. Country X produced more cars than Country Y. Here, the clause in blue includes a subject (Country Y) but no verb. Implied comparison: Country X produced more cars than Country Y [produced]. The verb in brackets is omitted but implied. _________________ Mitch Hunt Private Tutor for the GMAT and GRE GMATGuruNY@gmail.com If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon. Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance. For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com. Student Review #1 Student Review #2 Student Review #3 Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now. Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Joined 23 Apr 2017 Posted: 13 messages GMATGuruNY wrote: It is quite common, however, for the second clause in a comparison to include a subject but omit the verb. Country X produced more cars than Country Y. Here, the clause in blue includes a subject (Country Y) but no verb. Implied comparison: Country X produced more cars than Country Y [produced]. The verb in brackets is omitted but implied. In the example above, is verb 'produce' mandatory to allow a construction free of ambiguity? Take this example: I love more pizza than Marry (does/loves). I eat more pizza than Marry (does/eats). In second example above, the meaning could help us to eliminate verb in second clause. But does GMAT accept this omission depending on meaning? Thanks Sir ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 25 May 2010 Posted: 15204 messages Followed by: 1861 members Upvotes: 13060 GMAT Score: 790 gmattoend wrote: GMATGuruNY wrote: It is quite common, however, for the second clause in a comparison to include a subject but omit the verb. Country X produced more cars than Country Y. Here, the clause in blue includes a subject (Country Y) but no verb. Implied comparison: Country X produced more cars than Country Y [produced]. The verb in brackets is omitted but implied. In the example above, is verb 'produce' mandatory to allow a construction free of ambiguity? Take this example: I love more pizza than Marry (does/loves). I eat more pizza than Marry (does/eats). In second example above, the meaning could help us to eliminate verb in second clause. But does GMAT accept this omission depending on meaning? Thanks Sir The verb in the second clause may be omitted as long as the intended comparison is crystal clear. Correct: John ate more pizza than Mary. Here, only interpretation is possible: John ate more pizza than Mary ate. Since the intended comparison is crystal clear, a verb is not required in the second clause. Not viable: Russia exports more oil to Europe than the United States. Here, the intended comparison is NOT crystal clear. Two possible meanings: Case 1: Russia exports more oil to Europe than IT EXPORTS OIL TO THE UNITED STATES. Case 2: Russia exports more oil to Europe than THE UNITED STATES EXPORTS OIL TO EUROPE. If Case 2 is intended, a verb is required in the second clause to make the intended comparison crystal clear. Correct: China exports more oil to Europe than DOES the United States. _________________ Mitch Hunt Private Tutor for the GMAT and GRE GMATGuruNY@gmail.com If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon. Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance. For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com. Student Review #1 Student Review #2 Student Review #3 Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now. Legendary Member Joined 25 Sep 2015 Posted: 651 messages Followed by: 5 members Upvotes: 14 GMATGuruNY wrote: TheGraduate wrote: Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their production history. A) small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their B) small cars that are more fuel-efficient than they were at any time in their D) more fuel-efficient small cars than those at any other time in their Please comment on pronoun ambiguity of "their" in (A),(D) and of "they" and "their" in (B). In A and D, it is unclear whether their serves to refer to manufacturers or to small cars. Eliminate A and D. Forms of they (they, them, their) cannot serve to compare TWO DIFFERENT SETS OF X. Incorrect: This year's cellphones are better than THEY were last year. Here, the usage of they implies that the SAME set of cellphones is being discussed in each instance. Not so. The intention is to compare ONE set of cellphones (this year's cellphones) to ANOTHER set of cellphones (last year's cellphones). Correct: This year's cellphones are better than last year's. B: small cars that are more fuel-efficient than they were at any time in their history Here, the intention is compare ONE set of cars (today's small cars) to ANOTHER set of cars (small cars produced in the past). Since forms of they cannot serve to compare two different sets of X, eliminate B. Dear GMATGuru, In the OA C, does 'those' refer to 'small cars' or 'small cars that are more fuel-efficient'? GMATGuruNY wrote: Incorrect: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than those last year. Correct: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than last year. The correct version implies the following comparison: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than [it produced cars] last year. In the following (OG2017 SC#758): Prices at the producer level are only 1.3 percent higher now than a year ago and are going down, even though floods I the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised corn and soybean prices. A: than a year ago and are going down, even though floods I the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised B: than those of a year ago, and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raising C: than a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising D: as those of a year ago and are going down, even though floods in the Midwest and drought in the south hurt crops and therefore raise E: as they were a year ago and are going down, despite floods in the Midwest and drought in the south, and are hurting crops and therefore raising Why A is wrong? In light of your examples about manufacture, we can omit the subject and verb and their presence could be implied as follows: Prices at the producer level are only 1.3 percent higher now than [Prices at the producer level are] a year ago. Where did I go wrong? I think it is like to your example: 'The manufacturer produced more cars this year than last year' Thanks ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 25 May 2010 Posted: 15204 messages Followed by: 1861 members Upvotes: 13060 GMAT Score: 790 Mo2men wrote: In the OA C, does 'those' refer to 'small cars' or 'small cars that are more fuel-efficient'? Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars that are more fuel-efficient than those at any other time in production history. Here, that serves to refer to small cars. Thus, the portion in blue conveys the following: Small cars [today] are more fuel-efficient than those at any other time in production history. Here, those = small cars. Implied comparison: Small cars [today] are more fuel-efficient than small cars at any other time in production history. Quote: In the following (OG2017 SC#758): A: Prices at the producer level are only 1.3 percent higher now than a year ago and are going down, even though floods I the Midwest and drought in the south are hurting crops and therefore raised corn and soybean prices. Why A is wrong? Check my explanation here: http://www.beatthegmat.com/og-2016-sc-90-t289707.html _________________ Mitch Hunt Private Tutor for the GMAT and GRE GMATGuruNY@gmail.com If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon. Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance. For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com. Student Review #1 Student Review #2 Student Review #3 Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now. Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 05 Dec 2015 Posted: 120 messages Target GMAT Score: 720 GMATGuruNY wrote: Incorrect: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than those last year. It seems to imply the following nonsensical comparison: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than cars last year produced. The implied meaning is incorrect because of the passive construction in the later part of the clause or because the phrase "cars last year produced" can refer to all cars, irrespective of the manufacturer, produced last year ? ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 25 May 2010 Posted: 15204 messages Followed by: 1861 members Upvotes: 13060 GMAT Score: 790 gocoder wrote: GMATGuruNY wrote: Incorrect: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than those last year. It seems to imply the following nonsensical comparison: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than cars last year produced. The implied meaning is incorrect because of the passive construction in the later part of the clause or because the phrase "cars last year produced" can refer to all cars, irrespective of the manufacturer, produced last year ? Incorrect: The manufacturer produced more cars cars this year than those last year. Conveyed meaning: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than those last year [produced cars]. Since those is standing in for cars, we get: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than cars last year [produced cars]. The implied comparison is nonsensical. This issue is that those last year seems to be serving as the SUBJECT of the second clause, implying-- nonsensically -- that cars produced cars. Correct: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than last. Conveyed meaning: The manufacturer produced more cars this year than [the manufacturer produced cars] last [year]. This comparison is logical. _________________ Mitch Hunt Private Tutor for the GMAT and GRE GMATGuruNY@gmail.com If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon. Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance. For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com. Student Review #1 Student Review #2 Student Review #3 Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now. • 1 Hour Free BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5 Day FREE Trial Study Smarter, Not Harder Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Magoosh Study with Magoosh GMAT prep Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Practice Test & Review How would you score if you took the GMAT Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • FREE GMAT Exam Know how you'd score today for$0

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

### Top First Responders*

1 GMATGuruNY 56 first replies
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow 43 first replies
3 Jay@ManhattanReview 43 first replies
4 Ian Stewart 31 first replies
5 ceilidh.erickson 15 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

217 posts
2 fskilnik@GMATH

GMATH Teacher

124 posts
3 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

89 posts
4 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

82 posts
5 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

66 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts