Several financial officers

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pm
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 71 times
Followed by:17 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmat740 » Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:03 am
Guys!

I agree A is subjunctive mood. But....

What is wrong with E?

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 11:40 am

by Top5bound » Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:04 am
What's wrong with C?
The officers spoke (past tense). At the time the condition was made, it would have been future tense. However, the condition exists now (after officers spoke), so it should be present tense ("are" instead of "will", ruling out B). Also, the officers don't want their names printed (or used), so "names" is a better as a noun than a verb "be named".
Anbody agree with this?

Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:06 am
Thanked: 7 times

Re: Several financial officers

by real2008 » Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:43 am
ektamatta wrote:Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition that they not be named in
the press reports.
A. that they not be named
B. that their names will not be used
C. that their names are not used
D. of not having their names
E. of not naming them
as per choice a, it appears to me that financial officers will be given new name in the press conference, and thus option doesn't make sense

b: better to use the present tense.
c: perfectly ok

d: fo s are definitely having names, rather they want their names not be quoted
e: choice speaks about giving new name or something like that

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 447
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: Kolkata,India
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:670

by uptowngirl92 » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:16 pm
Several financial officers of the company spoke on condition that they not be named in the press reports.
A. that they not be named
B. that their names will not be used
C. that their names are not used
D. of not having their names
E. of not naming them
Condition>>Subjunctive reqd>>use "that".
Eliminate D,E

I think we can eliminate C on the grounds that the press reports will happen in the future..C uses present tense..

Explanations for A and B please!!

Oa is [spoiler][spoiler=]A[/spoiler][/spoiler]

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 447
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: Kolkata,India
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:670

by uptowngirl92 » Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:58 pm

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:58 pm
this is from OG10

very hard for me

anyway I try to explain

"of not..." is not idiomatic

"will..." is wrong because there is no future here

"not be named..." mean "not spoken about" so meaning is wrong although subjuctive use is right.

C is left.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:58 pm
gmat expert, ple help us

Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

by maihuna » Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:35 am
huh lot of discussion, no expert yet chipin...I think its a good candidate for subjunctive ...and so option A make sense, w/o that it is really hard to cross several options.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by Psychodementia » Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:06 am
Let us presume you did not know this is subjunctive use then also there are other clues to help you.

"named in the press reports" is less ambiguos than "used in the press reports" (used to create the reports? used to bind the reports?).

This eliminates B and C

"Condition of X" will hold true is X is a noun and not a phrase such as "condition of anonymity" or "condition of the house" etc.

"Condition that X" however can be used when X is a pharse or rather in the event of X happening only then......

Hope this helps,

Arun