Which of the following...

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 5:34 pm
Thanked: 7 times

Which of the following...

by hwiya320 » Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:35 pm
Which of the following cannot be true if the sum of k consecutive integers is 0?

The product of the k integers is positive
The smallest of the k integers is zero
The largest of the k integers is negative
a) I only
b) II only
c) III only
d) I and III
e) I, II and III

Legendary Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:59 am
Location: USA
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:1 members

by niraj_a » Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:41 pm
E?

assuming k = 2 and higher

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:21 am

by Emawk » Wed Dec 03, 2008 5:13 pm
I don't have much confidence when it comes to the GMAT, but let's see if I can tackle this. Hopefully, it'll give me some confidence needed to motivate me.

I) If some of the consecutive numbers are negatives, and if the number of integers in the set could be either even or odd, the product of the consecutive numbers could be either positive or negative. So (I) could be true, but not necessarily so.

(II) If the smallest of the k integers is zero, then each other integers in the set is a positive value greater than zero. Adding all these positives together will give you a larger positive value and not the zero indicated in the question stem. So (II) cannot be true.

(III) If the largest of the integers is negative, then each other integer in the set is a negative. Adding together negatives will only give you a larger negative value and not zero. So (III) cannot be true.
Last edited by Emawk on Wed Dec 03, 2008 5:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Wed Dec 03, 2008 5:14 pm
I think the answer is III only.

k does not have to be greater than 1 (no where given) - This is the catch to this problem in my opinion

k could be 1 consecutive integer i.e 0 The smallest /largest of the k integers are both zero


The product of the k integers is positive -2 -1 1 2



The largest of the k integers is negative - This cannot be true since there has to be some positives to make the sum 0 or just 0 which is non negative

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:21 am

by Emawk » Wed Dec 03, 2008 5:23 pm
Emawk wrote:I don't have much confidence when it comes to the GMAT, but let's see if I can tackle this. Hopefully, it'll give me some confidence needed to motivate me.

I) If some of the consecutive numbers are negatives, and if the number of integers in the set could be either even or odd, the product of the consecutive numbers could be either positive or negative. So (I) could be true, but not necessarily so.

(II) If the smallest of the k integers is zero, then each other integers in the set is a positive value greater than zero. Adding all these positives together will give you a larger positive value and not the zero indicated in the question stem. So (II) cannot be true.

(III) If the largest of the integers is negative, then each other integer in the set is a negative. Adding together negatives will only give you a larger negative value and not zero. So (III) cannot be true.
I didn't think this through carefully enough.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Wed Dec 03, 2008 5:40 pm
No worries.I made a mistake also.

-2 -1 1 2 are not consecutive integers.

So the answer is D) (0 is non positive non negative so the product cannot be positive)

I give up if thats not it :-) I think the key in GMAT is to check/recheck as quickly as possible if indeed u have confirmed to the question stem in picking numbers. Fro eg: They would have asked x+2 and we would be answering x and both will be answer choices in the problem

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:21 am

by Emawk » Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:14 pm
cramya wrote:No worries.I made a mistake also.

-2 -1 1 2 are not consecutive integers.

So the answer is D) (0 is non positive non negative so the product cannot be positive)

I give up if thats not it :-) I think the key in GMAT is to check/recheck as quickly as possible if indeed u have confirmed to the question stem in picking numbers. Fro eg: They would have asked x+2 and we would be answering x and both will be answer choices in the problem
How did you come to the conclusion that (I) cannot be true?

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Wed Dec 03, 2008 7:40 pm
How did you come to the conclusion that (I) cannot be true?
The product will always be 0(since 0 will occur in the list if its just 1 consectuive intger or more), correct which is non positive so I cannot be true.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 5:34 pm
Thanked: 7 times

by hwiya320 » Wed Dec 03, 2008 7:44 pm
cramya wrote:
How did you come to the conclusion that (I) cannot be true?
The product will always be 0(since 0 will occur in the list if its just 1 consectuive intger or more), correct which is non positive so I cannot be true.
cramya is correct, D is the OA.

I wanted to make sure everyone sees the tricky part of (II). I got this wrong because I automatically assumed that "consecutive" number has to be greater than 1.. but since it's not stated that k>0, it's a possibility that these consecutive number was actually a single digit, 0.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:31 pm
The smallest of the k integers is zero

If this statement is CORRECT...and the trick is oh the set is 0...I dont call this a trick or a trap..it is just stupid!

I am mad ;-)
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:21 am

by Emawk » Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:44 pm
cramya wrote:
How did you come to the conclusion that (I) cannot be true?
The product will always be 0(since 0 will occur in the list if its just 1 consectuive intger or more), correct which is non positive so I cannot be true.
Damn, I should have seen that.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:31 pm
as many posters have already noted, the correct answer to this problem is (d).

you guys can rest easy re: the trick thing. i simply can't imagine that the gmat would actually include a cheap shot such as statement (ii), which is only true when k = 0.

there are two grammatical hurdles there: first of all, it distinctly says "integers" (plural), and, second of all, it distinctly says "smallest" (-est implies 3 or more numbers).

yes, it's true that mathematicians would respond that "k consecutive integers" can include the case of 1 "consecutive" integer, and that the smaller of 2 numbers, or 1 singleton number itself, is subsumed under "smallest".
but the gmat simply doesn't include problems that depend this much on word-twisting.

doesn't hurt to know, though.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:44 pm
lunarpower wrote:as many posters have already noted, the correct answer to this problem is (d).

you guys can rest easy re: the trick thing. i simply can't imagine that the gmat would actually include a cheap shot such as statement (ii), which is only true when k = 0.

there are two grammatical hurdles there: first of all, it distinctly says "integers" (plural), and, second of all, it distinctly says "smallest" (-est implies 3 or more numbers).
Thanks Lunarpower. This is exactly why I thought that this question could not be a good representative of GMAT.

But I guess - I should have been more careful and thought all the possible solutions.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:50 pm
logitech wrote:Thanks Lunarpower. This is exactly why I thought that this question could not be a good representative of GMAT.
agreed.

but at least it's not wrong, so there's no harm in practicing on it.
if anything, practicing on such questions is probably a good thing, as doing so will help you develop a razor-sharp ability to find exceptions and isolated cases.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Legendary Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:59 am
Location: USA
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:1 members

by niraj_a » Thu Dec 04, 2008 12:03 am
lol

good stuff