Search found 5 matches
@silvelineinsky There is nothing wrong in attempting questions from SC1000. In whichever question you are stumped, try to search those questions for the explanation on various forums, e.g., BTG, Manhattan. Try Google the questions, you would get links to relevant forums. I found explanation to all m...
- by rajesh.chaudhary
Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:36 am- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Papgust's GMAT SENTENCE CORRECTION FLASHCARDS directory
- Replies: 349
- Views: 192037
- by rajesh.chaudhary
Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:32 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Trade Embargo
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2145
- by rajesh.chaudhary
Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:40 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Net Neutrality
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1528
A. attempts to undermine the legislators’ credibility instead of addressing their argument – argument does not mention anything about the credentials of the legislators. Hence, wrong. B. bases its conclusion on subjective judgments rather than on an objective criterion of moral offensiveness –...
- by rajesh.chaudhary
Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:04 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: CR Legislators
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1857
- by rajesh.chaudhary
Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:03 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Wolves
- Replies: 78
- Views: 36860