Search found 113 matches
I'm very skeptical about the second question; it says xy = 1, and then asks what 2(x+y)^2/2(x-y)^2 is equal to. Take x = 4 and y = 1/4 for example' xy = 1. (4+1/4)^2 = 18.0625. (4-1/4)^2 = 14.0625. When you divide 18.0625 by 14.0625, you do not get 16. Flag that question for review
1) The best way to solve this would not be through using the geometric progression formula. Too tedious. Best way to solve it is through intuition. First number is -1/2, next is 1/4, and then -1/8 and so on and so forth, so essentially when you add the first and second term you get -1/4, so the answ...
For the answer to your second question (the one with the attachment); It's 16P2 - 16 = 16!/14! - 16 = 240 - 16 = 224 Now 16P2 is essentially the total number of ways in which mike and the other guy can be arranged. 16 ways is the number of ways in which they ALWAYS sit across each other. There are 5...
Picking numbers would actually be the most efficient strategy in my opinion. You could however reason this out but you have to be wary of this method. First, see that when you add the same thing to both the denominator and the numerator than the fraction will increase in value if the numerator is sm...
The above poster is wrong;
when t = 1
h = -16(1-3)2 + 150 = 214
when t = 0
h = 96 + 150 = 246
so, the question is a little messed up. Because there is nothing that says it will reach a max. height at 3. It could reach it at 1 second.
4!/2! + 4!/2! - 3!2!2!
- by prindaroy
Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:51 pm
- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: Two couples and one single person are seated at random in a
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1464
yes the question is a little vague. So, essentially, for out of every 7, three play football as well? Are these the only people playing football? so if there are 70 rugby players then 30 of them play football as well and 40 play only rugby? And so, if 10% of the people play only rugby, then the peop...
statement B alone is sufficient; IMO we'll come to this; 5^2 * z = 3 * x^y, so we get that x^y = 25, 50, 75 or all multiples of 25, knowing that x is prime will show us that 5 is the only possible number that can achieve this; 15, 10 are not prime and cannot do that. So statement B alone is sufficie...
IMO D rule of divisibility for 3 is addition of numbers shud be multiple of 3....thus if ab multiple of 3 implies that a+b multiple of 3 statement 2 proves "a" multiple of 3 and "2b" multiple of 3 since 2 not divisible by 3 implies b divisible by 3... If a divisible by 3 and b divisible by 3 then a...
D for first one. because AD = BC = 12. 2 * 3/8 = 3/4*12 = 9. Therefore 12 - 9 = 3. So 3 is the answer or D. For the second one then answer is 45 degrees, because 2x + 2x + 2x + (180 - 2x) = 360, x =45
The answer should be 60. The answer 10 is very silly. The total number of possibilities = 120 and in half of them, Bob will finish ahead of Marge. So the answer is 60. 10 cannot be the answer because there are 5 different people in 5 different positions.
Okay, so ever number from 1 to 50 will divide h(100) right? But not one of those numbers will divide h(100)+1, because they already divide h(100). So the smallest number that will do so, has to be greater than 50. In the choices given, greater than 40 is the only choice that reflects our solution. S...
The answer E. this question has been asked before but I don't where the thread is but anyways;
h(100) = 2*4*6*................*100
so for a divisor of h(100) + 1, to happen, it would have to be greater than 50 or in this case 40.