Search found 5 matches
Ok, I reread the OG question about bats. The focus seems to be different even though the structure is incredibly similar.
But D does seem to make more sense here.
- by Steppanyaki
Sun May 10, 2009 7:55 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Marsupial Lions
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3992
But couldn't you theoretically find the probability of choosing non defective by taking 1 and subtracting it with the probability of choosing defective? I get so confused about the right or wrong time to apply this rule.
- by Steppanyaki
Sat May 09, 2009 7:35 am- Forum: Problem Solving
- Topic: Probability of not selecting something
- Replies: 8
- Views: 12579
I agree with Scoobydooby - E.
The question structure and logic is so similar to the question in OG11 about bats and blood vessels.
- by Steppanyaki
Sat May 09, 2009 4:30 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Marsupial Lions
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3992
[spoiler]You're right. OA is D[/spoiler] I had trouble with this one. While I didn't doubt that D was a viable answer, I had some trouble eliminating C. I thought the focus of this problem was whether everyone would have "future access to new life-sustaining drugs." And I interpreted C to ...
- by Steppanyaki
Wed May 06, 2009 8:00 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Weaken - drug patent issue
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4360
Weaken - drug patent issue
In countries in which new life-sustaining drugs cannot be patented, such drugs are sold at widely affordable prices; those same drugs, where patented, command premium prices because the patents shield patent-holding manufacturers from competitors. These facts show that future access to new life-sust...
- by Steppanyaki
Wed May 06, 2009 5:59 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Weaken - drug patent issue
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4360