mhasan - Reading your plan, no doubt you have a solid ground here. It's time for you to dig your heels deeper. Since you have more time in your hand, you can certainly pull it off. Don't let go of the perseverence and you'd be fine. You mentioned that you are also looking for a job. Remember, when i...

Thank you very much, David. Not seeing "if true" blind-sided me in this question. From now on, I think that I can spot the question correctly by finding the conclusion. I didn't know this before. Now, I read the Veritas book again. It clearly mentioned to spot "support" for stren...

Definitely a great discussion going on here. uwhusky - By reading your comments, it seems that you are thinking this question to be an assumption question. According to me, this is an inference questions. But I may be wrong. I made a detailed list of different types of inference question. And I foun...

If E is the OA, then I have to revisit my fundamentals :-) E is going to far by giving specific reason. "Knocked down unconscious" is one reason. There could be many other reasons. For example, the victim didn't know how to swim but the victim was consious. It is completely out of scope to...

A> Sentence structure error; Linking verb is missing. B> Same sentence structure error; Also, elephants are countable. So we need “many�. Also, there is pronoun reference error with “them� C> Elephants are countable. So we need “many�. However, the major problem child here is “with a t...

When locating the subject, get rid of prepositional phrase. The noun in the prepositional phrase can't be subject in any circumstance.

A> The construction is “arguing�+�in a treatise…� or participle + prepositional phrase. Or simply, it’s a participial phrase. Now, the participial phrase most likely modifies the subject, which is “Lucretia Mott�. Now the question is – Is Lucretia Mott arguing or is the argument in...