Search found 4 matches
I find that your reasoning is not sufficiently robust. Notice, the OA is about plastic containers, but the OA answers the question. So eliminating an answer choice because it focuses on something not discussed in the prompt is not really an effective method. In fact, I have seen people eliminate the...
- by ResilientSoul
Sat Oct 01, 2016 10:12 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Tough & Tricky CR Prep question
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5386
I want to understand why B is wrong better. I rephrased the argument as follows Garbage DUE TO beverage containers declined. Recycling of glass and aluminium was identified as a cause. Also Recycling of aluminium was more popular than recycling of glass(Ideally it should follow that % of aluminium i...
- by ResilientSoul
Sat Oct 01, 2016 2:30 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Tough & Tricky CR Prep question
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5386
Your two Official GMAT scores are remarkably similar (even though your prior score was from the pre-IR version of the GMAT). This implies that 'your way' of dealing with the GMAT is fairly consistent (even years later); by extension, to score 750+, you're going to have to make some fundamental chan...
- by ResilientSoul
Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:13 pm- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: 710- For what its worth it was worth all the while!
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6005
710- For what its worth it was worth all the while!
Background: Indian IT product manager with 8 years of work experience. Appeared for GMAT 6 years ago and ended up with a 700 then (Q47 and V 37). I started prepping for the GMAT from Late December 2015. Ended up with a 710 (Q 49 , V 36) The Journey I am working full time Consistently dedicated 15 hr...
- by ResilientSoul
Sat Jul 30, 2016 11:21 pm- Forum: I just Beat The GMAT!
- Topic: 710- For what its worth it was worth all the while!
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6005