Search found 5 matches
Why Not E?
E: discounted price + exclusive feature to other accessories of no use.
i think E satisfies all conditions..
- by pskode
Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:56 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: OA seems to be wrong, please help
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1944
- by pskode
Mon Aug 06, 2012 10:29 pm- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: william sydney potter
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1651
IMO C :
1st is clearly a conclusion and 2nd one is supporting the premise that although one part is bad the whole should not be considered bad.. ( in simple language 
)
in option D : looks promising to me bt then realised there is no anology as such in 1st boldface ..
- by pskode
Wed Aug 01, 2012 11:10 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: underrated
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1283
my original pick was E but i found that no where in passage author denise that seage's wealth didnt ESTABLISHED A NON-PROFIT FOUNDATION FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PUBLIC SOCIAL CONDITIONS. so i was wrong. about opton C : psg doesnt generalises logically , cause if it had been then final conclusion would...
- by pskode
Mon Jul 30, 2012 6:49 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Critical reasoning doubt
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1475
IMO "C" is right answer :
reason : statement from psg:
It was common, though optional, for a master smith to place a physical Signature on a blade; in addition, every master smith had a "structural signature" due to his own secret forging process
- by pskode
Mon Jul 30, 2012 1:23 am- Forum: Reading Comprehension
- Topic: Historians have long recognized the Japanese sword
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4627