Search found 4 matches
Sorry to bring this one up from the graves. But need expert reply on this one plz. Option C does the trick here. According to it, the grades improved by an X process. It is possible the grades may just not improve. Could be that sudents were not willing to improve. Option C proves that the grades co...
- by pdsrocks
Sun Feb 12, 2012 12:24 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: A recent study -- princeton review CAT
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1516
Q32: A major chemical spill occurred five years ago at Baker�s Beach, the world�s sole nesting ground for Merrick sea turtles, and prevented nearly all the eggs laid that year from hatching. Yet the number of adult female Merricks returning to lay their eggs at Baker�s Beach has actually incr...
- by pdsrocks
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:02 pm- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: Turtle
- Replies: 10
- Views: 8957
IMO C . If you negate this option, the argument breaks. C can be negated. 1.listening area decreased. 2. Radio receivers remained the same. 3. No of people receiving information does not increase. At max it wil remain same. My worry is option D. Suppose in 1996, n people could listen without radios...
- by pdsrocks
Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:48 am- Forum: Critical Reasoning
- Topic: RDS technology
- Replies: 12
- Views: 6749
- by pdsrocks
Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:01 pm- Forum: Sentence Correction
- Topic: Use of AND ALSO - Experts opinion please.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1670