skins81 wrote:how did you prepare for quant and verbal? what books did you use?

I think D is wrong negating D says most parents will buy video games for children Or in other words zero or atleast one parent will not buy video game for there children , If its zero then I agree answer is D but if atleast one parent does not buy - then legislation still helps to curb atleast one c...

for proof that SD<= Range /2 Please refer https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:6h3vYqGBuGIJ:www.stat.tugraz.at/AJS/ausg093/093Al-Saleh.pdf+properties+of+standard+deviation&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgxlemtD8xG3bAAAofSAJ4rQIkShLPWMWVfikH31eyIhi6XcWMJc05PITHIXc6PZZZc1YmuG...

one additional thought on this question If a comma is inserted after tilting will the answer change? Geologists believe that the warning signs for a major earthquake may include sudden fluctuations in local seismic activity, tilting , and other deformations of the Earth's crust, changing the measure...

thank you testluv and Kevin.

I appreciate your efforts to explain the answer. I am convinced

POE leads to either E or D now E is out because E compares minibar with refrigerator from maintainence cost and ignores the profit due to sale of minbar items D is better because D says minibar business is loss making...if one removes loss from any business then profit is always there for e,g, It li...

i somehow think D strengthens the argument If D were true , then is means crappy buildings are less likely to exist. which means crappy buildings before 1930 as well after 1930 are less likely to exist... so in no way does it impact the argument for e.g lets say total 100 hotels were built before 19...