Scored 780 thanks to Ian Stewart

Find out how Beat The GMAT members tackled GMAT test prep with positive results. Get tips on GMAT test prep materials, online courses, study tips, and more.
This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

by iamcste » Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:15 pm
Ian Stewart wrote:
iamcste wrote: Hi Ian,

thanks for your great posts. Can you please elaborate on the overpenalize part? Is this true and how much can it impact you, can it really reduce your raw verbal points by more than 10 (meaning 40 to 30 because you mismanaged time)
The short answer is: I don't really know; only the test designers know precisely how the question selection algorithm works. I ca say the following with some confidence:

* It doesn't hurt you much to get an 800-level question wrong; that only proves you likely aren't an 800-level test taker. It hurst a lot more to get a 400-level question wrong;

* The description you read in prep books about the algorithm ('get a question right, your next question is harder; get a question wrong and your next question is easier') is an oversimplification. There are several factors that the algorithm uses to select your next question, and your ability estimate is only one of those factors (the test also needs to ensure content balance, and that no question is overused). So even if you are doing well, it is possible to see questions which are 'easy', and which still count, and these could show up at the end of your test. If you don't have time to attempt these, you're risking answering an easy question incorrectly.

* Some of my higher scoring students told me that they found the end of their test much easier than the beginning. Now, that may just be coincidence, but near the end of the test, the algorithm has a lot of information about your level; it is, perhaps, then less important to deliver questions near your ability. So while I have no way of knowing for sure, it strikes me as a possibility that there may be questions near the end which are of a lower difficulty than you might expect. Were I designing the test, and if I wanted to ensure that later questions were as important as early ones, that's something I would consider, at least. Whether the real test works that way I can't say - I only have anecdotal evidence to go on.

* Pacing of course is critical, but for your score to fall from a 40 to a 30, you would need to miss quite a few questions; answering one or two questions incorrectly at the end certainly will not make your score fall that far. If you needed to guess at 10 questions in a row at the end, however, then your score could fall quite dramatically.
Heartfelt thanks to you, Ian!

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:46 pm
GMAT Score:710

by neonshark » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:49 pm
Unfortunately, can't get in touch with Ian Stewart. He doesn't respond. :(

Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

by GMATMadeEasy » Wed Jun 30, 2010 1:08 pm
What is GMAT focus you mentioned there ?

Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

by GMATMadeEasy » Wed Jun 30, 2010 1:31 pm
When you were doing LSAT material ,how did you set your timinngs ? and How were you doing for RC and CR both ?

this is to understand how one should time during LSAT questions sets because timings given in LSAT test paper are way different from actual GMAT ones.

and of course congratulations for such a good score.

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:46 pm
GMAT Score:710

by neonshark » Thu Jul 01, 2010 12:04 am
GMATMadeEasy wrote:What is GMAT focus you mentioned there ?
Just google it.

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:11 pm

by barista1 » Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:35 pm
Hey manuka, great job on GMAT and I hope you've achieved what you wished for.

you've mentioned in your de-brief, AWA part, that
My guide was the following template (literally): weak analogies, correlation vs causation, necessary versus sufficient, statistical problems such as bias, relevance and sample size, and things changing over time.
I'm wondering what were those templates and whether there are some samples or resources available based on those definitions: weak analogies, correlation vs causation...

Thanks again for all the efforts,
barista1

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:28 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by amir_hatef » Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:53 am
Congratz man, really awesome score, could not better even than this. I am really glad to see your score and all the best wishes for your application. Keep us updated with your amazing feedback and experience. Thanks.