Changes in Sentence Correction. An Important read!

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 6:20 am
Thanked: 3 times
Hello everyone:

I just read this article on the Manhattan GMAT Blog and thought I'd share it here. In the recently held 4th GMAC Test Prep Summit, Dr. Larry Rudner, who is in charge of psychometrics for GMAC has confirmed that there were significant changes that were made to the Sentence Correction questions that appear on the GMAT. Things like: deciding to phase out Idioms; emphasising on the meaning along with grammar, ergo you get to see two answer choices which are grammatically correct.

Here's the link to the article, do read this when you find the time: https://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... orrection/

Cheers!
Vinay

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:48 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:6 members

by gunjan1208 » Sat Sep 17, 2011 12:53 am
Wow! Thats really a news.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:11 am
No more Idioms on test, if at all rare! Love it :)

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: US
Thanked: 527 times
Followed by:227 members

by e-GMAT » Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:17 am
Folks, the reason why sentence correction is tested on the GMAT is to test your ability to identify a correct and effective expression (refer page 651 and 656 in OG12). The original meaning is central to this exercise. The purpose is not served if you choose an answer choice that is just grammatically correct but conveys meaning that is very different from the original sentence. Note, this was a big departure from OG 10 which was more grammar focused (Check out Ron's post here)

This should not come as a surprise to a lot of you as meaning has been an integral part of GMAT Sentence correction ever since OG 12 was released. This is one reason why meaning has been in integral part of the eGMAT sentence correction process. During our research we identified multiple examples in OG 12 where an SC question had more than one answer choice that was grammatically correct. In such instances, OG prefers the sentence that communicates the same logical meaning as the original sentence.

Here is an excerpt from one of Payal's posts in March 2010:

"We have seen a few instances of this in Official Guide, Edition 11 &12, where the question contains multiple grammatically correct choices and the correct answer is the choice that most clearly conveys the meaning in the original sentence. Official Guide considers these (grammatically correct) choices to be incorrect because according to OG, these choices distort the meaning of the original sentence.
Consider for example, Question # 84, OG-12.

The original sentence states that ozone is formed in the atmosphere when A and B react with sunlight.

Choice C - incorrect per OG - states that ozone is formed in the atmosphere and when A and B react with sunlight. This choice while grammatically correct, distorts the meaning of the original sentence because it states that ozone is formed in two ways: 1) in the atmosphere and 2) when A and B react with sunlight.

You may observe similar pattern in question 115 (Gall's hypothesis) where choices B and E are deemed incorrect because they distort the meaning expressed in the original sentence"

You may also check her post at this link.
For e-GMAT customers:
If you are following the e-GMAT process, meaning should be an integral part of your approach and you don't need to change anything. Make sure that you revise the L1 Application File 3, L2 Application File 3, and all Level 3 Application files as almost all questions in these files have significant emphasis on the meaning and can be solved correctly if you understand the meaning. In fact all other application files & UGE questions also have similar style questions.

New content:
We will release 2 new UGEs (exercises) that will test the same in the next 2 weeks. eGMAT customers will get access to these free of charge. Watch out for our announcement.

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:23 am

by thevishz » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:31 am
Well egmat i am considering you for CR , but keeping view of recent changes i am planning to enroll for your SC too, But how many days it will be before the new content to SC with emphasis to meaning and related practice is added to SC course ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 4:24 pm
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:1 members

by 1947 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:00 am
both the examples from OG that u pointed are good practice for meaning error.
Please let us know other similar questions from OG and verbal review book

Thanks
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button. Thanks

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: US
Thanked: 527 times
Followed by:227 members

by e-GMAT » Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:53 pm
Vishz and 1947,

Our current course contains more than 15 questions that test the same. We will be sending out a detailed email to our registered users listing the references to the eGMAT questions. I recommend that you register on our site (free of charge) so that you can receive the email with more details.

Regards,

Rajat

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: US
Thanked: 527 times
Followed by:227 members

by e-GMAT » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:35 pm
1947 wrote:both the examples from OG that u pointed are good practice for meaning error.
Please let us know other similar questions from OG and verbal review book

Thanks
We have added 2 more such official questions and analysis of all 4 questions with focus on the two grammatically correct answer choices in each question. Click here to view the details.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: US
Thanked: 527 times
Followed by:227 members

by e-GMAT » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:27 am
Dear Test Takers,

I can sense a lot of anxiety about the impact of the discussed changes. I understand that these changes are major and can have a major impact on how most of you approach Sentence Correction questions. Based on the comments in this forum and on GMATClub , I also sense some disbelief about the findings from the summit. Therefore, this morning I called Dr. Lawrence Rudner (in charge of psychometrics for GMAC) to clarify the same. In short, MGMAT's comment (Stacy's really) about these changes are accurate and already in effect. Therefore, please do not doubt them.

Dr. Rudner, reiterated the same message that is in MGMAT's blog posting. Firstly, he (Dr. Rudner) wants to make the test fair to everyone and hence GMAC has made a decision to de-emphasize idioms. Note, idioms come more naturally to native test takers since they use them in their day to day conversation. By de-emphasizing idioms, GMAC is making the test more fair to non-native test takers. He also confirmed that this change is already in effect.

Secondly, regarding the emphasis on meaning - According to Dr. Lawrence Rudner, meaning has always been the central part of SC and in his words "people should read and understand the original prompt before going to other answer choice". I mentioned to him that this point is not very clearly stated in the instructions (even though our team here at e-GMAT was able to infer this intent from the instructions and the questions and that is why the central theme of our course is "Meaning"). Based on this, he agreed that he might do the following:

1: Have an official press release from GMAC where these points are clarified. (He said that he will discuss this with his team)
2: Have this (emphasis on the intended meaning conveyed by the original prompt) clearly stated in OG13 (to be released in April 2013)

Should you be anxious?
I understand that any change makes us nervous. However, non-natives should really welcome this change for this is made to put them on an equal footing. This does mean however that for people who primarily focus on grammar and primarily use the 2-3 split method may have to adapt and pay more emphasis on the meaning. Remember, it was never GMAC's intention to make you grammar experts. They always focused on clarity of thought and expression. Other than that, this seems like business as normal.

How can you prepare for this change?
Revise the following questions to better understand what these change means.
1. OG12 (#84, #115)
2. GMAT Verbal Ed 2 (#37, #52)

In addition to the above, there are 13+ questions in e-GMAT SC course that test the same. You may review this link for more details.

e-GMAT customers:
e-GMAT customers should welcome this change, for this re-enforces the emphasis on meaning. The existing e-GMAT process already takes care of this, and you don't need to learn anything new. In addition to the OG questions, there are several questions in the e-GMAT application files that discuss the same concept. Please revise these questions once again. We will also offer a free live session to all our SC customers on Saturday, September 24 at 630 a.m. (Arizona Time) to address any questions that you have. As promised, we are working on adding more such questions to our course.

Thank you and next steps
I would like to thank Stacy for bringing this up to Dr. Rudner and Dr. Rudner to take time out and clarify this matter with me. I hope that we get the official press release soon.

I encourage GMAT aspirants to not overly worry about this. As you can see, you have examples of such sentences in official materials. Revise these questions again and make sure that you pay emphasis on the intended meaning while answering GMAT Sentence Correction questions.

Happy studying,

Rajat Sadana
Founder and CEO
e-GMAT LLC.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 6:04 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by priya2gupta5 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:12 am
Thanks e-GMAT for posting the analysis of 4 official questions. It helps put these changes in perspective...

Yeah I am so happy about the idioms...:) No more memorizing...Actually it is interesting to see that while idioms are gone but if idioms are related to meaning of the sentence, then they will still be important. For more on this read carefully the explanation on OG Verbal # 52 on e-gmat blog and Stacey's post on MGMAT.

Here are the two links:
https://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=745
https://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... -the-gmac/
____________________________________
If you like what I write, do not hesitate to "thank"...

BTW origin of the word "thank"
- from Old English thancian;
- akin to Old English thanc gratitude

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 5:32 am
Location: Classroom courses in Delhi | Bangalore | Video courses across the planet
Thanked: 48 times
Followed by:64 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:08 pm
This post will help all non-native speakers in general and Indians in particular.

Why should you read this post?

This is Sandeep Gupta, a GMAT Trainer in Bangalore India (I run the company Ivy-GMAT). I have always had 99th percentile scores on the Verbal Section (in the range of 45 to 51) of the GMAT; also I have always scored 51 in the Quantitative Section. I have never scored less than 770 (Q51, V45) on any of my GMAT attempts.

I am writing what helped me get such scores time and again. If you are a native speaker, you may not find the post useful.

****

What I have been telling at my students for the last 20 months is FINALLY validated by the GMAC!

GMAT SC is all about meaning clarity. Two or more options can be grammatically correct ... the right meaning wins the day for you.

For more details, check ManhattanGMAT Blog.

"How to get that coveted 99th percentile score on the current-day GMAT?"

CAVEAT: All the recommendations mentioned below are for a 99th percentile score. If you want to score less, you may proportionally reduce the input.

The GMAT has not announced the changes in the other sections but let me tell you all about them from my experiences:

RC:

Not even one direct question is being asked these days. All questions are based on purpose, main point, tone, and very subtle inferences. OCTAVE Technique wins the day for you hands down. You may miss it at your own peril.

SHOCKING as it may seem ...

NONE of the national / international GMAT training companies seem(s) to have any effective approach to tackle RC.

My approach to a 99th percentile score in RCs:

Step 1: Master OCTAVE

Step 2: Solve at least 200 CR inference questions (YES CR inferences not RC inferences), trying to understand how wrong answers are made wrong; also see HOW CLOSE the choices can be.

Step 3: Solve about 200-300 real GMAT + real LSAT passages using OCTAVE ... (Latest RC, OG 10, 11, 12, VR 1, VR 2, LSAT 60 papers)

Step 4: Try four-hour sittings with LSAT RCs (at least 8-10 sittings). As the GMAT is a four-hour long affair and as people struggle most while concentrating on RC, the best way to tackle this is to have four-hour long nonstop sittings with RC and only RC.

Step 5: For 2-3 consecutive days, solve at the rate of at least 40-50 LSAT passages per day (before your test).

If you promise all the above steps to the T, I guarantee 100% accuracy in RC ...

CR:

These days, all CR questions tend to be quite convoluted. You must be really good at deconstructing complex life- and business-situations given in complex language. Assumption / evaluate / complete the passage / numbers and percentages etc. happen to be the most favorite topics on the GMAT lately. Also, most students find it extremely hard to finish any CR question in about 90 seconds (the ideal time for CR).

My approach to a 99th percentile score in CRs:

Step 1: Master ACT ... Assumption Centrality Technique. You must be able to almost guarantee that you will never get any assumption question wrong.

Step 2: Take up about 50 BOLDFACE questions and deconstruct each argument threadbare. Don't mark the answers ... just do a threadbare analysis. Each statement can be either a supporting statement (evidence, premise, fact, consideration, situation, supporting reason etc.), or the conclusion of the author (prediction, opinion, judgement, hypothesis, position, claim etc.), or a sub-conclusion supporting the conclusion of the author, or the conclusion of the other party (usually some critics or some other people whose reasoning is countered by the author). The advantage of this process is that the entire approach to deconstructing any argument will become so crystal-clear to you that all the gaps in any argument (assumptions, flaws, irrelevant / incomplete / distorted evidence(s), number vs percentage jugglery etc.) will become obvious to you.

Remember: ASSUMPTIONS win the day for you.

Step 3: Master Evaluate the Argument approach ... You must be able to almost guarantee that you will never get any Evaluate question wrong.

Step 4: Try to see the numbers vs percents deception that is used so intelligently by the GMAT. You must be able to understand all the subtle nuances with numbers and percentages.

Step 5: Understand other types: Cause and effect, weaken, strengthen, paradox, inference, 2 speakers, situation reaction, complex chains of reasoning etc.

Step 6: Remember all the terms that mean "support to a conclusion" and all the terms that mean the "conclusion". Solve the aforementioned BOLDFACE questions (this time mark the answer ).

Content to refer: Latest CR, LSAT CR (60 papers), OG 10, 11, 12, VR 1, VR 2.

If you promise all the above steps to the T, I guarantee 95-100% accuracy in CR ...

SC:

People who go only by grammar rules and not by meaning clarity are going to be ravaged by this change.

My approach:

To get to 95-100% accuracy level in SC, one needs at least a six-month perspective from now on ... don't expect such accuracy by just a gimmicky preparation of a couple of months.

Start EARLY ... the GMAT will be a much more difficult test to crack with this new revision in SC.

Students targeting 2013 admits should start right from now!!

Step 1: Start reading The New York Times editorials online on a daily basis. Any similar quintessentially American text will also do (The Washington Post, Scientific American, National Geographic etc.). Just read for a couple of hours in the free time you get ... whenever possible.

This will help you improve drastically in all the areas: SC, CR, and RC.

Step 2: Master PRIMEX (Preferences, Rules, Intended Meaning, Exceptions, X-factor logic) technique with IM (intended Meaning) as the central guiding force.

Step 3: You must solve 50+38+100 question set at least 5-6 times ... from the point of view of meaning clarity.

Step 4: Solve only real GMAT content ... any material prepared by any other company is going to be quite unreliable. This may include Latest SC, OG 10, 11, 12, VR 1, VR 2, 9 old GMAT PDF papers, parts of 1000 SC ... only parts.

Step 5: Write brief explanations to all latest SC questions only from the point of view of Meaning Clarity. Force yourself not to use grammar or idiom for elimination. This will indeed be tough as a lot of questions are not based on meaning clarity, especially in OG 10, 11, and VR 1. When it is impossible to eliminate on the basis of meaning alone, use other elimination approaches.

Step 6: Create the right answers to all the aforementioned questions (as full sentences) and revise this set at least 4-5 times before the test. This step is used extremely effectively by the Chinese, who are able to crack SC in grand style.

One more thing: The earlier approach of just doing Manhattan SC book and the OGs alone may not be the foolproof approach.

Make sure you seek expert guidance; preparing for the GMAT in its new avatar on your own can be quite risky. Unless you see an expert explaining these questions from the point of view of meaning clarity, you will not be able to master them in style.

If you promise all the above steps to the T, I guarantee an accuracy of at least 95% in SC.

Quant:

Let's face it. Getting a 51 in Quant is no easy task. It means ensuring not more than one wrong answer.

I know people will hate me for this statement:

If you are fundamentally weak at or scared of Math, I am sure you can't turn the tables on the GMAT and score a 51 with mere preparation / practice. You may indeed reach a 49 or a 50 (easily) with a lot of study / practice ... but a 51 in Quant demands some level of mathematical intuition (already present in you).

My approach to a 51 score in Quant:

Solve all the DS questions first from the toughest possible content (Quant Latest and Quant 700-800). Get to the basics of each question. Don't see the solution too soon. Persist with each question until you finally give up / get the answer.

Referring to the solutions too soon is the biggest disservice that you can do to yourself in Math. You have to relish the toughness of the content and keep an extremely dogged approach ... tenacity is the name of the game.

You should reach a stage where your reaction time is less than 20 seconds (i.e., in 20 seconds you know precisely what you need to do to reach the solution). Also, if you are really good at GMAT Quant, not even one question should take you more than 2 minutes.

The next step will be 'mastery of each topic'. I still see that 9 out of 10 students who call themselves good at Math still have some weak topics in Math ... even one weak topic can ruin it for you.

Just remember that Q51 is not a smaller challenge than V44.

Q50 may happen for innumerable number of students but Q51 is a tough deal.

Feel free to contact me for any more doubts.

Cheers,
Sandeep
Sandeep Gupta | Asia's only GMAT trainer with multiple 770/800 and a perfect 800/800 score |
Check out my results on www.top-one-percent.com

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:23 am

by thevishz » Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:22 am
E-gmat,

I am planning to take your SC course and understand there are 500 plus questions in application files. What are UGE questions then and do i have access to them too ? How many questions are there in UGE ?

Thanks Much!
thevishz

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: US
Thanked: 527 times
Followed by:227 members

by e-GMAT » Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:45 am
Hi thevishz,

Our e-GMAT SC course contains over 500 questions. This count includes the questions in application files and UGE. Basically when you start the course you attempt concept files to learn the pertinent grammatical concepts and understand their application. After performing a set of concept files, you then do the application file in which you learn to apply the meaning based approach for solving SC questions. After this, you then attempt the given set of questions from OG12 and you solve these questions by applying this process. This workflow (concept file set - application file - OG12 practice) continues till you complete all course work. Then comes the UGE for additional practice. In UGE section you have timed quizzes with detailed solutions for additional practice. Note that you get access to UGE of a certain level as soon as you complete the course work of that competence level.

Hope this helps.

Payal

PS: when you purchase the course we send you a detailed study plan along with some best practices. :)