Can someone clarify the singular versus plural question here...
rising costs...are responsible for....seems more correct than rising costs...is responsible...
is this correct ?
what about Rising real estates ...on an earlier post everyone seems to think this it is singular ?
Any general comments on singular versus plural rules for such subjects...
General comments on sing vs plural
This topic has expert replies
- DanaJ
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2567
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
- Thanked: 712 times
- Followed by:550 members
- GMAT Score:770
"Costs" is a plural noun, so it needs to be matched with a plural verb, in this case "are." So yes, you are right about that one!
However, "rising real estates" is incorrect. I personally have not seen "real estates" anywhere and I have a feeling that you're confusing this phrase with "real estate," which is a term that defines land or housing or buildings. "Real estate" is indeed singular, so it would require a singular verb such as "is."
However, "rising real estate" doesn't make sense either, since "real estate" (think of a piece of land or a house) cannot "rise," it just stays there I'd be tempted to believe the correct phrase would be "rising real estate costs," but that's just my feeling about it!
However, "rising real estates" is incorrect. I personally have not seen "real estates" anywhere and I have a feeling that you're confusing this phrase with "real estate," which is a term that defines land or housing or buildings. "Real estate" is indeed singular, so it would require a singular verb such as "is."
However, "rising real estate" doesn't make sense either, since "real estate" (think of a piece of land or a house) cannot "rise," it just stays there I'd be tempted to believe the correct phrase would be "rising real estate costs," but that's just my feeling about it!
- Jim@Grockit
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:07 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Thanked: 162 times
- Followed by:45 members
- GMAT Score:760
In fact, the only place you'd ever see "real estates" is with a completely different "real" -- the one opposed to "virtual" or "artificial", rather than the one most often associated with property.
If it helps, the "real" in "real estate" actually comes from French "royale" and the notion that all land was ultimately the property of the king; all the other uses of "real" (like "reality" and "realize" and "really") come from a Latin word meaning "thing." It's just coincidence that they look like the same word now; they have totally different histories and origins.
If it helps, the "real" in "real estate" actually comes from French "royale" and the notion that all land was ultimately the property of the king; all the other uses of "real" (like "reality" and "realize" and "really") come from a Latin word meaning "thing." It's just coincidence that they look like the same word now; they have totally different histories and origins.