- gmat_perfect
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:38 pm
- Thanked: 127 times
- Followed by:14 members
Historians generally agree that, of the great modern innovations, the railroad had the most far-reaching impact on major events in the United States in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, particularly on the Industrial Revolution. There is, however, considerable disagreement among cultural historians regarding public attitudes toward the railroad, both at its inception in the 1830s and during the half century between 1880 and 1930, when the national rail system was completed and reached the zenith of its popularity in the United States. In a recent book, John Stilgoe has addressed this issue by arguing that the "romantic-era distrust" of the railroad that he claims was present during the 1830s vanished in the decades after 1880. But the argument he provides in support of this position is unconvincing.
My paraphrase:
Historians are in agreement that railroad had impact on the industrial revolution. Historians were in disagreement about the issue of attitude towards railroad.
Now, I am in confusion about the phrase "romantic era distrust".
Does the last sentence mean "distrust about railroad was present in 1830, and it was vanished after 1880?"
Experts, please help.
thanks.
My paraphrase:
Historians are in agreement that railroad had impact on the industrial revolution. Historians were in disagreement about the issue of attitude towards railroad.
Now, I am in confusion about the phrase "romantic era distrust".
Does the last sentence mean "distrust about railroad was present in 1830, and it was vanished after 1880?"
Experts, please help.
thanks.

















