BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC Question

Expert replies
by RaviKiran » Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:06 pm
Many psychologists and sociologists now contend that the deliberate and even brutal aggression integral to some forms of competitive athletics increase the likelihood of imitative violence that erupts among crowds of spectators dominated by young adult males.
(A) increase the likelihood of imitative violence that erupts
(B) increase the likelihood that there will be an eruption of imitative violence
(C) increase the likelihood of imitative violence erupting
(D) increases the likelihood for imitative violence to erupt
(E) increases the likelihood that imitative violence will erupt


Kindly help me clarify why the answer is E not D ....
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by muralimba » Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:25 pm
A, B and C are out as the singular verb "increases" is required for the singular subject i.e. (deliberate and even brutal)aggression integral.

b/w D and E, E is the best option as we need a future tense due to the noun "likelihood".

Any expert comments.

Regards,
Murali.
Thank me if you like my post.
Join the discussion

by gmat_perfect » Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:45 pm
RaviKiran wrote:Many psychologists and sociologists now contend that the deliberate and even brutal aggression integral to some forms of competitive athletics increase the likelihood of imitative violence that erupts among crowds of spectators dominated by young adult males.
(A) increase the likelihood of imitative violence that erupts
(B) increase the likelihood that there will be an eruption of imitative violence
(C) increase the likelihood of imitative violence erupting
(D) increases the likelihood for imitative violence to erupt
(E) increases the likelihood that imitative violence will erupt


Kindly help me clarify why the answer is E not D ....
The issues:

I don't know what are the logic behind you used to eliminate the options A, B, and C.


Let me say something:

The head master and secretary has attended the meeting. [One "the"]

The head master and the secretary have attended the meeting. [Two "the'']

Conclusion: The + NOU/Adj + AND + The +NOUN/Adj --creates a compound NOUN, which is plural and needs a plural verb.

--> This kills A, B, and C.

2. Likelihood that Vs Likelihood for

--> Likelihood for X is NOT correct.
Likelihood of X is preferred to likelihood for.

Likelihood expresses "the probability". it means something has not yet happened. There is a probability that she will pass.

We cannot say "there is a probability that she passes".

So, we need future tense verb "will" to indicate that the event has not yet happened.

There will be a shift:

If we say like this one:

There was a probability that she would pass. Was --Past; Would --past.

So, we are required to use "will" if the previous part of the sentence is in present tense.

D is out for two things:
1. Likelihood for
2. Did not use future tense.

Answer is E.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1