A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg
A A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included
B The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, included
C Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist, included
D Included in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly's exploits are
E The pioneer journalist's exploits of Nellie Bly included
B
Can anyone please explain the sentence construction using option B.
A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
HI chetan86,
This SC is based on Modification rules. We need an answer that places the phrase "a pioneer journalist" in the proper spot and doesn't make any other mistakes.
Since you asked about Answer B, I'll focus on that:
My guess is that you're asking about this question because you don't "like" the correct answer. When I first read this prompt, I didn't "like" the correct answer either, but it does use proper grammar rules (and the other answers all have significant problems).
The commas in B are a big clue of Modification. The phrase "a pioneer journalist" should refer to the noun immediately next to it. Also, you should be able to remove that entire piece of the sentence ("a pioneer journalist") and still have a complete and correct sentence. You should notice that "Nellie Bly" immediate precedes "a pioneer journalist" and the phrase, when removed, leaves a complete sentence.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
This SC is based on Modification rules. We need an answer that places the phrase "a pioneer journalist" in the proper spot and doesn't make any other mistakes.
Since you asked about Answer B, I'll focus on that:
My guess is that you're asking about this question because you don't "like" the correct answer. When I first read this prompt, I didn't "like" the correct answer either, but it does use proper grammar rules (and the other answers all have significant problems).
The commas in B are a big clue of Modification. The phrase "a pioneer journalist" should refer to the noun immediately next to it. Also, you should be able to remove that entire piece of the sentence ("a pioneer journalist") and still have a complete and correct sentence. You should notice that "Nellie Bly" immediate precedes "a pioneer journalist" and the phrase, when removed, leaves a complete sentence.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:52 pm
- Thanked: 53 times
- Followed by:21 members
Hi chetan86,
Answer B contains the descriptive phrase "a pioneer journalist," offset from the rest of the sentence by commas. If you remove the phrase, you have a little less information, but you still have a correct sentence:
"The exploits of Nellie Bly included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg." This is the basic information conveyed in the sentence.
Finding the correct answer is really a question of where we put the phrase "a pioneer journalist" that makes the sentence correct or not (assuming there are no other problems).
Putting "a pioneer journalist" at the start of the sentence is incorrect because it is the wrong order. It introduces the extra description of the object (Nellie Bly) before the object itself. Eliminate A.
Answer B has the descriptive phrase in the correct spot.
Answers C, D and E are a little more obviously wrong. Eliminate them.
Answer B contains the descriptive phrase "a pioneer journalist," offset from the rest of the sentence by commas. If you remove the phrase, you have a little less information, but you still have a correct sentence:
"The exploits of Nellie Bly included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg." This is the basic information conveyed in the sentence.
Finding the correct answer is really a question of where we put the phrase "a pioneer journalist" that makes the sentence correct or not (assuming there are no other problems).
Putting "a pioneer journalist" at the start of the sentence is incorrect because it is the wrong order. It introduces the extra description of the object (Nellie Bly) before the object itself. Eliminate A.
Answer B has the descriptive phrase in the correct spot.
Answers C, D and E are a little more obviously wrong. Eliminate them.
Yeah, you are right. I did not like the way sentence is constructed. I got confused because modifier was referring to a NOUN, which is available in an 'Of-phrase'.[email protected] wrote:HI chetan86,
This SC is based on Modification rules. We need an answer that places the phrase "a pioneer journalist" in the proper spot and doesn't make any other mistakes.
Since you asked about Answer B, I'll focus on that:
My guess is that you're asking about this question because you don't "like" the correct answer. When I first read this prompt, I didn't "like" the correct answer either, but it does use proper grammar rules (and the other answers all have significant problems).
The commas in B are a big clue of Modification. The phrase "a pioneer journalist" should refer to the noun immediately next to it. Also, you should be able to remove that entire piece of the sentence ("a pioneer journalist") and still have a complete and correct sentence. You should notice that "Nellie Bly" immediate precedes "a pioneer journalist" and the phrase, when removed, leaves a complete sentence.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Using POE I selected answer option B. While reviewing this question I thought 'a pioneer journalist' to make sense it is at the correct position because if we reword the sentence as 'Nellie Bly's exploits' then it would become difficult to place phrase 'a pioneer journalist'. BTW I learned something new from this question.
Hi David,David@GMATPrepNow wrote:Hi chetan86,
Answer B contains the descriptive phrase "a pioneer journalist," offset from the rest of the sentence by commas. If you remove the phrase, you have a little less information, but you still have a correct sentence:
"The exploits of Nellie Bly included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg." This is the basic information conveyed in the sentence.
Finding the correct answer is really a question of where we put the phrase "a pioneer journalist" that makes the sentence correct or not (assuming there are no other problems).
Putting "a pioneer journalist" at the start of the sentence is incorrect because it is the wrong order. It introduces the extra description of the object (Nellie Bly) before the object itself. Eliminate A.
Answer B has the descriptive phrase in the correct spot.
Answers C, D and E are a little more obviously wrong. Eliminate them.
Thanks a lot for your explanation and inputs. Your approach to solve this kind of question would definitely help me in future. Thank you!!
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 11:11 am
- Location: Lahore, Pakistan
- Thanked: 87 times
- Followed by:204 members
A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Foggsscsh472 wrote:Can somebody please explain what's wrong with option A?
incorrect/illogical apposition (major issue)
Journalist cannot be exploits
noun noun disagreement (minor issue but still an issue. Above one is much much easier to spot and is the one you will encounter much often in SC)
one journalist = more than one exploit
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:55 pm
Now "Nellie Bly's exploits" and "Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg" are not structurally parallel any more. isn't that an issue?
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 11:11 am
- Location: Lahore, Pakistan
- Thanked: 87 times
- Followed by:204 members
No.
Why?
( answer following Questions )
Can you write Nellie Bly's exploits as Exploits of Nellie Bly?
Yes.
Why? Reason?
[spoiler]Because neither it changes the grammar nor does it changes meaning.[/spoiler]
As grammar has not been altered and meaning has not been changed, it is structurally and logically parallel.
No difference what so ever between Nellie Bly's exploits and Exploits of Nellie Bly viz-a-viz grammar and meaning.
GMAC loves to make incorrect answer choice(s) look a bit more parallel.
I call it parallelism of looks.
Purpose is to lure into incorrect answer choice.
Parallelism cannot be applied blindly i.e by keeping logic at bay.
Why?
( answer following Questions )
Can you write Nellie Bly's exploits as Exploits of Nellie Bly?
Yes.
Why? Reason?
[spoiler]Because neither it changes the grammar nor does it changes meaning.[/spoiler]
As grammar has not been altered and meaning has not been changed, it is structurally and logically parallel.
No difference what so ever between Nellie Bly's exploits and Exploits of Nellie Bly viz-a-viz grammar and meaning.
GMAC loves to make incorrect answer choice(s) look a bit more parallel.
I call it parallelism of looks.
Purpose is to lure into incorrect answer choice.
Parallelism cannot be applied blindly i.e by keeping logic at bay.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
APPOSITIVES are nouns that appear side-by-side, with one noun serving to explain or define the other noun.sscsh472 wrote:Can somebody please explain what's wrong with option A?
Rule:
Appositives must refer to the SAME THING.
A: A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly's exploits included circling the globe.
Here, a pioneer journalist and Nellie Bly's exploits seem to be appositives, implying that a JOURNALIST and EXPLOITS are the same thing.
This meaning is nonsensical.
Eliminate A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
OA: The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg.samrat.mandal wrote:Now "Nellie Bly's exploits" and "Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg" are not structurally parallel any more. isn't that an issue?
An AGENT is the initiator of an action.
Here, it is crystal clear that Nellie Bly is the agent of circling, since she was the journalist CIRCLING the globe.
Conveyed comparison:
NELLIE BLY was CIRCLING faster than PHILEAS FOGG.
This comparison is logical.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 11:11 am
- Location: Lahore, Pakistan
- Thanked: 87 times
- Followed by:204 members
Subject verb disagreement.gocoder wrote:What is wrong with D, is it passive ?
It is an inverted structure;In this kind of a structure verb appears before the subject.
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 11:11 am
- Location: Lahore, Pakistan
- Thanked: 87 times
- Followed by:204 members
D) Included in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly's exploits are circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg.
Subject is noun.
Noun can have modifiers( phrases, adj clauses etc.) attacted to it.
Further, subject cannot be in a prepositional phrase; However, there is an exception[1].
Prep. phrase begins with a prep and ends with a noun or noun equivalent( such as noun clause).
Included is not a noun.
It is a ved type ( past participle)modifier;
However, subject needs be a noun.
in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly's exploits is a prep phrase;
We cannot have a subject in a prep phrase[1].
are is a verb;
Now it essentially means that we are dealing with an inverted structure here.
So, watch out for a subject.
We only have one construction that appears after the verb and that construction is
circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg
This construction is called gerund phrase.
gerund phrase, in this case, is a subject.
gerund phrases are always singular.
However, the verb in D (are) is plural, hence SVA issue.
-----------------------------------------------------
PS:
[1] exception is a quantity expression:
majority of cases are fake
A number of x are blah blah
The number of y is blah blah .
Subject is noun.
Noun can have modifiers( phrases, adj clauses etc.) attacted to it.
Further, subject cannot be in a prepositional phrase; However, there is an exception[1].
Prep. phrase begins with a prep and ends with a noun or noun equivalent( such as noun clause).
Included is not a noun.
It is a ved type ( past participle)modifier;
However, subject needs be a noun.
in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly's exploits is a prep phrase;
We cannot have a subject in a prep phrase[1].
are is a verb;
Now it essentially means that we are dealing with an inverted structure here.
So, watch out for a subject.
We only have one construction that appears after the verb and that construction is
circling the globe faster than Jules Verne's fictional Phileas Fogg
This construction is called gerund phrase.
gerund phrase, in this case, is a subject.
gerund phrases are always singular.
However, the verb in D (are) is plural, hence SVA issue.
-----------------------------------------------------
PS:
[1] exception is a quantity expression:
majority of cases are fake
A number of x are blah blah
The number of y is blah blah .
Last edited by Ali Tariq on Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
Hi - in option D
As a test taker, how to determine what the subject is ...when i first read D, i thought the subject of "are" is exploits" not the gerund
Why isn't "Exploits" a candidate for the subject for the verb "Are"
As a test taker, how to determine what the subject is ...when i first read D, i thought the subject of "are" is exploits" not the gerund
Why isn't "Exploits" a candidate for the subject for the verb "Are"