Pronouns and Antecedents

This topic has expert replies

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:22 am
Sorry I'm only getting to this a month later. I've been drowning in PMs. :)

The noun is not required to be the subject or object of the sentence. It can function in other roles. Parallel structure does help to determine certain expectations, however. If you have two clauses with a pronoun in subject form in one clause, the expectation is typically that it refers to the noun in subject form in the other clause (assuming the two match in number - singular or plural).

The buildings are condemned, and they will be torn down tomorrow.

Fine. buildings = they, both in subject form

The building commission condemned the buildings, and they will be torn down tomorrow.

This is still okay, because "they" cannot go with the singular "commission," so "they" can only go with the plural "buildings."

The building commission members condemned the buildings, and they will be torn down tomorrow.

Er. This is not okay. Given a choice between two plural nouns, the structural expectation is that "they" should match in case - that is, "they" should match with "members" because both are subjects. But that doesn't make sense logically. Logically, "they" should match with "buildings." So we have a mis-match: structure points one way, while logic points another.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me