• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations
• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote Probability This topic has 2 expert replies and 15 member replies Goto page Legendary Member Joined 15 Jun 2010 Posted: 543 messages Followed by: 3 members Upvotes: 147 [quote="lunarpower"] anshumishra wrote: beat_gmat_09 wrote: anshumishra wrote: How does toss being consecutive adds anything to the question ? What is the difference between these two questions : A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads on consecutive tosses? vs A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads ? definitely not the same -- the default meaning of the former is, without a doubt, "at least 4 heads in a row without interruption". in fact, if you took a poll of native speakers of the english language (who, as far as i understand, are not common on this forum), i would bet decent money that 100% of them would interpret the statement in this way, without any hesitation. as far as why -- it's probably just the reflex action of assigning an essential modifier to the closest logical thing that it can modify. in that case, that means the immediate assignment of the modifier "on consecutive tosses" to the phrase "at least 4 heads", giving the desired meaning. of course, if this problem were official, it would almost certainly be phrased in a less bulky, easier-to-understand way, such as "what's the probability of getting at least 4 consecutive heads?" -- as another example, let's say that you enter a hallway that has a door on the right, and then a door on the left, and then a door on the right, and then a door on the left, etc. if someone says "go to the third door on the right", you will not go to the third door overall -- you'd count 1, 2, 3 on the right, and you'd ultimately arrive at the fifth door in the hallway. if that makes sense to you, then the above explanation should make sense as well. (and even if it doesn't, you should still commit that general form of description to memory -- since that's the way those modifiers are going to work, if you see them.) Thanks Ron for your expert comments on this question ! So to summarize, the OA for the given question is wrong : Q-> A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads on consecutive tosses? Correct OA -> 3/32 (See my solution above). This question asks in how many ways one can get at least 4 heads on consecutive tosses . The given OA would be right for the question : A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads ? OA -> 11/32 For the question : A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads on consecutive tosses? Quote: beat_gmat_09's comments - The tosses are consecutive, not the heads getting on the tosses ! Tosses being consecutive doesn't add anything to the question (It is understood from the question's first statement), as Ron has confirmed also, it asks for getting at least 4 consecutive heads on tosses. [/b] _________________ Thanks Anshu (Every mistake is a lesson learned ) Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 16 Oct 2010 Posted: 182 messages Upvotes: 4 [quote="anshumishra"] lunarpower wrote: anshumishra wrote: beat_gmat_09 wrote: anshumishra wrote: How does toss being consecutive adds anything to the question ? What is the difference between these two questions : A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads on consecutive tosses? vs A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads ? definitely not the same -- the default meaning of the former is, without a doubt, "at least 4 heads in a row without interruption". in fact, if you took a poll of native speakers of the english language (who, as far as i understand, are not common on this forum), i would bet decent money that 100% of them would interpret the statement in this way, without any hesitation. as far as why -- it's probably just the reflex action of assigning an essential modifier to the closest logical thing that it can modify. in that case, that means the immediate assignment of the modifier "on consecutive tosses" to the phrase "at least 4 heads", giving the desired meaning. of course, if this problem were official, it would almost certainly be phrased in a less bulky, easier-to-understand way, such as "what's the probability of getting at least 4 consecutive heads?" -- as another example, let's say that you enter a hallway that has a door on the right, and then a door on the left, and then a door on the right, and then a door on the left, etc. if someone says "go to the third door on the right", you will not go to the third door overall -- you'd count 1, 2, 3 on the right, and you'd ultimately arrive at the fifth door in the hallway. if that makes sense to you, then the above explanation should make sense as well. (and even if it doesn't, you should still commit that general form of description to memory -- since that's the way those modifiers are going to work, if you see them.) Thanks Ron for your expert comments on this question ! So to summarize, the OA for the given question is wrong : Q-> A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads on consecutive tosses? Correct OA -> 3/32 (See my solution above). This question asks in how many ways one can get at least 4 heads on consecutive tosses . The given OA would be right for the question : A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads ? OA -> 11/32 For the question : A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads on consecutive tosses? Quote: beat_gmat_09's comments - The tosses are consecutive, not the heads getting on the tosses ! Tosses being consecutive doesn't add anything to the question (It is understood from the question's first statement), as Ron has confirmed also, it asks for getting at least 4 consecutive heads on tosses. [/b] Thank you Legendary Member Joined 15 Jun 2010 Posted: 543 messages Followed by: 3 members Upvotes: 147 [quote="N:Dure"] anshumishra wrote: lunarpower wrote: anshumishra wrote: beat_gmat_09 wrote: anshumishra wrote: How does toss being consecutive adds anything to the question ? What is the difference between these two questions : A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads on consecutive tosses? vs A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads ? definitely not the same -- the default meaning of the former is, without a doubt, "at least 4 heads in a row without interruption". in fact, if you took a poll of native speakers of the english language (who, as far as i understand, are not common on this forum), i would bet decent money that 100% of them would interpret the statement in this way, without any hesitation. as far as why -- it's probably just the reflex action of assigning an essential modifier to the closest logical thing that it can modify. in that case, that means the immediate assignment of the modifier "on consecutive tosses" to the phrase "at least 4 heads", giving the desired meaning. of course, if this problem were official, it would almost certainly be phrased in a less bulky, easier-to-understand way, such as "what's the probability of getting at least 4 consecutive heads?" -- as another example, let's say that you enter a hallway that has a door on the right, and then a door on the left, and then a door on the right, and then a door on the left, etc. if someone says "go to the third door on the right", you will not go to the third door overall -- you'd count 1, 2, 3 on the right, and you'd ultimately arrive at the fifth door in the hallway. if that makes sense to you, then the above explanation should make sense as well. (and even if it doesn't, you should still commit that general form of description to memory -- since that's the way those modifiers are going to work, if you see them.) Thanks Ron for your expert comments on this question ! So to summarize, the OA for the given question is wrong : Q-> A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads on consecutive tosses? Correct OA -> 3/32 (See my solution above). This question asks in how many ways one can get at least 4 heads on consecutive tosses . The given OA would be right for the question : A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads ? OA -> 11/32 For the question : A coin is tossed 6 times. What's the probability of getting at least 4 heads on consecutive tosses? Quote: beat_gmat_09's comments - The tosses are consecutive, not the heads getting on the tosses ! Tosses being consecutive doesn't add anything to the question (It is understood from the question's first statement), as Ron has confirmed also, it asks for getting at least 4 consecutive heads on tosses. [/b] Thank you Thank you as well N:Dure! You have contributed to this thread equally ! Just wanted to summarize the question and the discussions (as this thread already has 4 separate questions going on) ! _________________ Thanks Anshu (Every mistake is a lesson learned ) • 5 Day FREE Trial Study Smarter, Not Harder Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Trial & Practice Exam BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Magoosh Study with Magoosh GMAT prep Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Practice Test & Review How would you score if you took the GMAT Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Get 300+ Practice Questions 25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • FREE GMAT Exam Know how you'd score today for$0

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

Top First Responders*

1 Brent@GMATPrepNow 41 first replies
2 Ian Stewart 37 first replies
3 Jay@ManhattanReview 32 first replies
4 GMATGuruNY 26 first replies
5 Scott@TargetTestPrep 14 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

199 posts
2 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

92 posts
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

74 posts
4 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

45 posts
5 Ian Stewart

GMATiX Teacher

43 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts