Ms. Adams sold two properties,X and Y for $30,000 each. She sold property X for 20 percent more than she paid for it and sold property Y for 20 percent less than she paid for it. If expenses are disregarded, what was her total net gain or loss, if any , on the two properties?
A Loss of $1250
B Loss of $2500
C Gain of $1250
D Gain of $2500
E No Gain No Loss
This question is from powerprep test1, I need explanation for this answer
Percentage Change - Need explanation
This topic has expert replies
30000 = 1.2X , X is the original price of property x
30000 = 0.8Y , Y is the original price of property y
Therefore, X = 25000 and Y = 37500
Total Cost price of two properties = 62500
Total Selling price of two properties = 60000
therefore, Loss of 2500
B
30000 = 0.8Y , Y is the original price of property y
Therefore, X = 25000 and Y = 37500
Total Cost price of two properties = 62500
Total Selling price of two properties = 60000
therefore, Loss of 2500
B
I understand that this question can be done by the method mentioned above working with the old and new values. However there is a formula for finding percentage change -
x+y+xy/100 (+ sign is used for profit and - for loss)
for example- The length of a rectangle increased by 40% and width decreased by 30%. Resulting area is what % increase or decrease by original area?
By applying the formula here -
=40-30-1200/100
=40-30-12
=-2 (- means loss)
so 2% decrease from the orginal
but when I tried to apply the same formula in the given question here, it doesnt work...
I did it using the formula as below -
20% increase and then 20% decrease on two items consecutively....
so 20-20-400/100
= 20-20-4
= -4 (which means 4% loss)
so 4% of 60,000 is 2400
means loss of 2400
but the actual answer coming is loss of 2500
Can someone please help me understand where am I going wrong? Thanks.
x+y+xy/100 (+ sign is used for profit and - for loss)
for example- The length of a rectangle increased by 40% and width decreased by 30%. Resulting area is what % increase or decrease by original area?
By applying the formula here -
=40-30-1200/100
=40-30-12
=-2 (- means loss)
so 2% decrease from the orginal
but when I tried to apply the same formula in the given question here, it doesnt work...
I did it using the formula as below -
20% increase and then 20% decrease on two items consecutively....
so 20-20-400/100
= 20-20-4
= -4 (which means 4% loss)
so 4% of 60,000 is 2400
means loss of 2400
but the actual answer coming is loss of 2500
Can someone please help me understand where am I going wrong? Thanks.
- hemant_rajput
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:13 am
- Thanked: 46 times
- Followed by:13 members
- GMAT Score:700
she got loss on the value she invested. so your calculation should 4% of 62500 not 60000.bharti06 wrote:I understand that this question can be done by the method mentioned above working with the old and new values. However there is a formula for finding percentage change -
x+y+xy/100 (+ sign is used for profit and - for loss)
for example- The length of a rectangle increased by 40% and width decreased by 30%. Resulting area is what % increase or decrease by original area?
By applying the formula here -
=40-30-1200/100
=40-30-12
=-2 (- means loss)
so 2% decrease from the orginal
but when I tried to apply the same formula in the given question here, it doesnt work...
I did it using the formula as below -
20% increase and then 20% decrease on two items consecutively....
so 20-20-400/100
= 20-20-4
= -4 (which means 4% loss)
so 4% of 60,000 is 2400
means loss of 2400
but the actual answer coming is loss of 2500
Can someone please help me understand where am I going wrong? Thanks.
Also you don't have money she invested so instead of going with such a tedious calculation remember this shot trick, "whenever a person sell two things at price X; one with Y% profit and other with Y% loss, there is always loss of y^2/100.
so when you apply this trick over here you'll get 20^2/100 i.e. 4% loss.
60000 = 96% of X => X = 62500.
Hope this helps.
Kudos,
Hemant
I'm no expert, just trying to work on my skills. If I've made any mistakes please bear with me.
- Jim@StratusPrep
- MBA Admissions Consultant
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:51 am
- Location: New York
- Thanked: 660 times
- Followed by:266 members
- GMAT Score:770
Looks like the math is right above. The key is to realize that you are starting from different bases. The base on the loss will be larger, so net you will have a loss. This is a good first step for eliminating answers.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review
![Image](https://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w12/Jim_Kernan/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-09%20at%208.50.26%20AM_zps7s8djw1g.png)
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review
![Image](https://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w12/Jim_Kernan/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-09%20at%208.50.26%20AM_zps7s8djw1g.png)
@hemant....hemant_rajput wrote: she got loss on the value she invested. so your calculation should 4% of 62500 not 60000.
Also you don't have money she invested so instead of going with such a tedious calculation remember this shot trick, "whenever a person sell two things at price X; one with Y% profit and other with Y% loss, there is always loss of y^2/100.
so when you apply this trick over here you'll get 20^2/100 i.e. 4% loss.
60000 = 96% of X => X = 62500.
Hope this helps.
Kudos,
Hemant
you hit the nail on the head....I should have calculated loss on her investment rather than on selling price...thanks for pointing and thanks so much for the trick as well....much appreciated!!!