In eskimo culture,equipment is designed for use by almost all members of their tribe;for instance,children and adults are able to maneuver kayaks because of their light weight and ingenious construction.
(e)children and adults are able to maneuver the kayaks becaus of these crafts'
OA is e
princeton question -eskimo culture
This topic has expert replies
- dj_vinayak
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:46 am
- Thanked: 1 times
- GMAT Score:720
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:1 members
Write all the choice and your doubt then it will be easy to answer.
Anyway the given choice is wrong.
Because after ; there should be an independent clause.
While
for instance,children and adults are able to maneuver kayaks because of their light weight and ingenious construction.
is not a independent clause.
Anyway the given choice is wrong.
Because after ; there should be an independent clause.
While
for instance,children and adults are able to maneuver kayaks because of their light weight and ingenious construction.
is not a independent clause.
- hardik.jadeja
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:12 am
- Thanked: 87 times
- Followed by:5 members
- GMAT Score:730
I think the original sentence is wrong because 'their' could refer to kayaks as well as children and adults. So there is pronoun ambiguity in the sentence.
- dj_vinayak
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:46 am
- Thanked: 1 times
- GMAT Score:720
but isnt the pronoun supposed to refer to the antecedenthardik.jadeja wrote:I think the original sentence is wrong because 'their' could refer to kayaks as well as children and adults. So there is pronoun ambiguity in the sentence.
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:31 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
Yes, Correct, but Pronoun needs to refer to antecedent unambiguously. when we read the sentence, we are not clear "their" refers to "kayaks" or "children and Adults"dj_vinayak wrote:but isnt the pronoun supposed to refer to the antecedenthardik.jadeja wrote:I think the original sentence is wrong because 'their' could refer to kayaks as well as children and adults. So there is pronoun ambiguity in the sentence.
- rockeyb
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
- Location: Nagpur , India
- Thanked: 41 times
- Followed by:1 members
The sentence as written is correct .dj_vinayak wrote:In eskimo culture,equipment is designed for use by almost all members of their tribe;for instance,children and adults are able to maneuver kayaks because of their light weight and ingenious construction.
(e)children and adults are able to maneuver the kayaks becaus of these crafts'
OA is e
Others have said the sentence has a pronoun ambiguity , but I dont think thats the case here .
I agree that THEIR (plural) matches in number with children ,adults or kayaks.
But look at the non-underlined portion light weight and ingenious construction . Now ask the question can can children or adults have light weight and ingenious construction dose that make sense ? No .
Now lets see if this makes sense for KAYAKS ... it dose . So to conclude THEIR here dose refer to KAYAKS and not children or adults .
Lets look at another example :
Ex: Mary and Jane went to the store and SHE lost her purse .
Now SHE here is personal pronoun , matches in number with the antecedent (Mary OR Jane) and since both can carry a purse and can loose it , we can never be sure if SHE here refers to Mary or Jane .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"