Dental caries and gingivitis can be exacerbated not only by the foods patients eat but also by when the patients eat them.
(A) not only by the foods patients eat but also by when the patients eat them
(B) by not only the foods patients eat but also by when the patients eat them
(C) not only by the foods patients eat but also by time when the foods are eaten
(D) by not only the foods that are eaten by patients but also by the times the foods are eaten
(E) not only by what patients eat but also by when they eat it
OA E
Dental caries and gingivitis can be exacerbated
I am a bit confused what it refers to in option E. I know it refers to what is being eaten but there is no direct reference available.
I agree that rest of the options are incorrect.
I agree that rest of the options are incorrect.
I have started to realize that I am the one!!!
'IT' can be used when there is no clear referrant to ittar.goyal wrote:I am a bit confused what it refers to in option E. I know it refers to what is being eaten but there is no direct reference available.
I agree that rest of the options are incorrect.
it is suprising that .......
the fact that .... is suprising
the first sentence clearly avoids pointing to the fact by using 'it'.
it just assumes that you can infer what is being talked about
this is just my opinion. don't know for 100% that it is correct
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:44 am
- Thanked: 26 times
I was between A & E and chose A over E because of the dangling it.
Are you sure that "IT" can be used without having a clear referent?
IMO, E would have been good without it
not only by what patients eat but also by when they eat
Are you sure that "IT" can be used without having a clear referent?
IMO, E would have been good without it
not only by what patients eat but also by when they eat
I have read either in kaplan or OG that it can be used without a referrant for expressing ideas
But it is always preferrable to avoid these kind of constructuctions
I don't remember which book i referred
so, now, i can't check this
It would be better if someone else can throw some more idea on this
But it is always preferrable to avoid these kind of constructuctions
I don't remember which book i referred
so, now, i can't check this
It would be better if someone else can throw some more idea on this
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 7:31 am
My 02 cents--
Plus i think food sounds more correct than foods espeically since no disticntion between various food types is made... not only does teh diet matter but also the time...so food seems more pref to foods.
Plus i think food sounds more correct than foods espeically since no disticntion between various food types is made... not only does teh diet matter but also the time...so food seems more pref to foods.
- airan
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:28 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- GMAT Score:710
My view,
first Foods doesnt fits here well ..So that very much eliminates A,B, C and D.
Patients or humans only eat food and nothing else ..So that is also wordy ..not required to mention what they eat .
B and D start with by not only ..which is incorrect here ..!
Multiple reasons for E to be the best choice ..
E is the best fit here ..!
first Foods doesnt fits here well ..So that very much eliminates A,B, C and D.
Patients or humans only eat food and nothing else ..So that is also wordy ..not required to mention what they eat .
B and D start with by not only ..which is incorrect here ..!
Multiple reasons for E to be the best choice ..
E is the best fit here ..!
Thanks
Airan
Airan
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:27 am
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:2 members
I agree with E, but I am not able to find a proper reason to rule out C on the grounds of parallelism. Also, 'it' in E does sound awkward, specially when we are reffering to foods....plural
Can somebody shed more light on why option C is wrong?
Can somebody shed more light on why option C is wrong?
- kvcpk
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1893
- Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
- Thanked: 215 times
- Followed by:7 members
Hi Ashish,ashish2104 wrote:I agree with E, but I am not able to find a proper reason to rule out C on the grounds of parallelism. Also, 'it' in E does sound awkward, specially when we are reffering to foods....plural
Can somebody shed more light on why option C is wrong?
Let me put in my thoughts. I do not know the grammatical structure in C exactly.
But, use of 'time' and 'when' simultaneously is looking awkward to me in C.
Let me know the time the train would arrive. - looks correct to me
Let me know when the the train arrives. -looks correct to me
Let me know the time when the train would arrive - looks awkward to me.
I might be completely wrong here
Also, C violates parallelism, because of "when"
not only by the foods patients eat but also by time when the foods are eaten
the foods -- time
patients -- when
Parallelism error.
I will still seek some expert opinion on this.
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)