Is mp greater than m?
(1) m > p > 0
(2) p is less than 1
OA: C
Manhattan Question Set # 6
This topic has expert replies
- richachampion
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2015 12:12 am
- Location: Noida, India
- Thanked: 32 times
- Followed by:26 members
- GMAT Score:740
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi richachamption,
To start, this should be in the DS Forum. That having been said, this prompt can be solved by TESTing VALUES and using Number Properties. The key is to recognize that the variables are not necessarily positive integers.
We're asked if MP > M. This is a YES/NO question.
1) M > P > 0
IF... M = 4, P = 2, then the answer to the question is YES.
IF... M = 4, P = 1/2, then the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT
2) P is LESS than 1
This Fact tells us NOTHING about the value of M.
IF... M = 4, P = 1/2, then the answer to the question is NO.
IF... M = -4, P = 1/2, then the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT
Combined, we know that...
P is LESS than 1
M > P > 0
Since P = positive fraction, then M = larger positive and the answer to the question is ALWAYS NO (since multiplying a positive number by a positive fraction will ALWAYS lead to a product that is smaller than the first number).
Combined, SUFFICIENT
Final Answer: C
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
To start, this should be in the DS Forum. That having been said, this prompt can be solved by TESTing VALUES and using Number Properties. The key is to recognize that the variables are not necessarily positive integers.
We're asked if MP > M. This is a YES/NO question.
1) M > P > 0
IF... M = 4, P = 2, then the answer to the question is YES.
IF... M = 4, P = 1/2, then the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT
2) P is LESS than 1
This Fact tells us NOTHING about the value of M.
IF... M = 4, P = 1/2, then the answer to the question is NO.
IF... M = -4, P = 1/2, then the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT
Combined, we know that...
P is LESS than 1
M > P > 0
Since P = positive fraction, then M = larger positive and the answer to the question is ALWAYS NO (since multiplying a positive number by a positive fraction will ALWAYS lead to a product that is smaller than the first number).
Combined, SUFFICIENT
Final Answer: C
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
- fiza gupta
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:55 pm
- Location: Punjab
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:7 members
GIven: mp>m
mp-m>0
m(p-1)>0
can be true if:
(i)m>0 and p>1 or (ii)m<0 and p<1
1) m>p>0
m>0 but p>1 or 0<p<1(p>0)
didn't satisfy neither i nor ii
NOT SUFFICIENT
2) p<1
but m?
NOT SUFFICIENT
combining
p>0 and p<1 => 0<p<1
(mp<m because m>p and 0<p<1, multiplication of positive number with positive fraction leads to small number)
SUFFICIENT
SO C
mp-m>0
m(p-1)>0
can be true if:
(i)m>0 and p>1 or (ii)m<0 and p<1
1) m>p>0
m>0 but p>1 or 0<p<1(p>0)
didn't satisfy neither i nor ii
NOT SUFFICIENT
2) p<1
but m?
NOT SUFFICIENT
combining
p>0 and p<1 => 0<p<1
(mp<m because m>p and 0<p<1, multiplication of positive number with positive fraction leads to small number)
SUFFICIENT
SO C
Fiza Gupta
- GMATinsight
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:34 pm
- Location: New Delhi, India
- Thanked: 205 times
- Followed by:24 members
Question :Is mp greater than m?richachampion wrote:Is mp greater than m?
(1) m > p > 0
(2) p is less than 1
OA: C
Question :Is mp - m > 0?
Question :Is m(p - 1) > 0?
Statement 1: m > p > 0
Now we know that m and p are positive but whether p-1 is greater than 0 or not is still unknown hence
NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: p < 1
Now we know that p-1 is Negative but whether m is greater than 0 or not is still unknown hence
NOT SUFFICIENT
Combining the two statements
Now we know that p-1 is Negative and m is positive hence
m(p-1) will be less than zero for sure
SUFFICIENT
Answer: Option C
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour