SC Q2GMATPrep- EXPERT HELP NEEDED

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 218
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:02 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:4 members

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Mar 18, 2014 10:12 am
I got rid of A and D first. Caused/causing the pollution of is an awkward and wordy way to say pollute/polluting.

E has a pronoun issue. "They" does not agree with "cargo".

In B, the use of "with" implies that the two events (the ship running aground and the cargo leaking) took place at the same time. This does not work because the ship was not already leaking as it ran aground. First, it ran aground, and then its cargo leaked.

C it is.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 218
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:02 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:4 members

by [email protected] » Wed Mar 19, 2014 6:32 am
Hey!
I found one more reason to eliminate "B".
We can't use "it" after "and"!
Tanuj ran to the police and filed the FIR.( correct)
Tanuj ran to the police and he filed the FIR. ( wrong)
Am I right?

Regards,
Mukherjee

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Wed Mar 19, 2014 10:05 am
I think the bigger problem with "it" in B is that it's a little ambiguous about what it's replacing. Is it the oil barge, or is it the cargo?
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test