If the fraction d were converted into a decimal, would there be more than 3 nonzero digits to the right of the decimal point?
(1) The denominator of d is exactly 8 times the numerator of d.
(2) If d were converted into a decimal, d would be a non-repeating decimal.
A - Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B - Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C - Both statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER one ALONE is sufficient.
D - EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E - Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
Decimal & Fraction
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:50 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
- thephoenix
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
- Thanked: 137 times
- Followed by:5 members
IMO Acrackthetest wrote:If the fraction d were converted into a decimal, would there be more than 3 nonzero digits to the right of the decimal point?
(1) The denominator of d is exactly 8 times the numerator of d.
(2) If d were converted into a decimal, d would be a non-repeating decimal.
A - Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B - Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C - Both statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER one ALONE is sufficient.
D - EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E - Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.
1) 1/8=0.125
ans no
hence suff
2)d can be .12;.123;.1234
so inconclusion insuff
- snigdha1605
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:41 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
But isnt the definition of a non repeating definition - A decimal that neither terminates nor repeats ?
Source : https://www.icoachmath.com/math_dictiona ... cimal.html
Source : https://www.icoachmath.com/math_dictiona ... cimal.html
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 1:48 pm
- Thanked: 4 times
yes that's true but here the question is :snigdha1605 wrote:But isnt the definition of a non repeating definition - A decimal that neither terminates nor repeats ?
Source : https://www.icoachmath.com/math_dictiona ... cimal.html
If the fraction d were converted into a decimal, would there be more than 3 nonzero digits to the right of the decimal point?
(1) The denominator of d is exactly 8 times the numerator of d.
(2) If d were converted into a decimal, d would be a non-repeating decimal.
As per 2 the decimal can be 0.12 or 0.312 both of which qualifies 2 but one gives an violates given expression(0.12) and the other does not(0.312).