Is n-1>0?

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:30 pm
Thanked: 4 times

Is n-1>0?

by paresh_patil » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:56 am
If n is an integer, is n-1>0?

1) n^2-n>0
2) n^2=9

Answer-E

I know that statement 2 is insufficient.
I need explanation on why statement 1 is not sufficient.
If you divide the inequality by n, can statement 1 stand sufficient?
Please help.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 1854 times
Followed by:523 members
GMAT Score:770

by Anurag@Gurome » Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:04 am
paresh_patil wrote:If n is an integer, is n-1>0?

1) n^2-n>0
2) n^2=9
Statement 1: n² - n > 0 ---> n(n - 1) > 0
This means either n and (n - 1) are of same sign.
Hence, it is possible that,
  • Both are positive ---> (n - 1) > 0
    Both are negative ---> (n - 1) < 0
Not sufficient

Statement 2: n² = 9 --> n = ±3

Not sufficient

1 & 2 Together: As n = ±3, either (3 - 1) > or (-3 - 1) < 0

Not sufficient

The correct answer is E.
paresh_patil wrote:If you divide the inequality by n, can statement 1 stand sufficient?
Never multiply or divide an inequality with a variable unless you know for sure that the variable can have only positive or only negative values. This is because dividing or multiplying an inequality with negative numbers change the inequality sign but doing so with positive numbers retains the same sign.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/