Scientists have found signs that moving water changed the chemical makeup of the surface of Mars in recent eras, therefore concluding that its crust is harboring up to three times as much water than was previously thought.
(A) eras, therefore concluding that its crust is harboring up to three times as much water than was
(B) eras, therefore concluding that the planet's crust harbors up to three times as much water or more as was
(C) eras and have therefore concluded that the planet's crust harbors up to three times as much water as
(D) eras and they have concluded, therefore, that its crust harbors up to three times as much water, or more, than
(E) eras and concluded, therefore, that the planet's crust is harboring up to three times more water as was
For C do you need "was" after as? What is the correct usage here?
Comparison
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:07 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:1 members
- HSPA
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 am
- Thanked: 47 times
- Followed by:13 members
- GMAT Score:640
nycknicks11 wrote:Scientists have found signs that moving water changed the chemical makeup of the surface of Mars in recent eras, therefore concluding that its crust is harboring up to three times as much water than was previously thought.
(A) eras, therefore concluding that its crust is harboring up to three times as much water than was
(B) eras, therefore concluding that the planet's crust harbors up to three times as much water or more as was
(C) eras and have therefore concluded that the planet's crust harbors up to three times as much water as
(D) eras and they have concluded, therefore, that its crust harbors up to three times as much water, or more, than
(E) eras and concluded, therefore, that the planet's crust is harboring up to three times more water as was
For C do you need "was" after as? What is the correct usage here?
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
- EducationAisle
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:42 pm
- Location: Bangalore, India
- Thanked: 91 times
- Followed by:46 members
I agree that was should have been ideally present in C. Though, you would have realized that it is lesser of an issue here since all other choices can be dis-regarded for other reasons (parallelism and meaning).
Can I ask what the source is for this question.
Can I ask what the source is for this question.
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com
Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:
a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana
b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana
Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com
Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:
a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana
b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana
Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
- itsmebharat
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:36 am
- Location: gurgaon
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:2 members
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
- Thanked: 45 times
- Followed by:2 members
Can someone please explain why Option B is wrong? if it's because of idiom issue, then please clarify the change i have made above is that valid? I have seen sometimes when the question and even the correct answer include something like above in as idiom.nycknicks11 wrote:Scientists have found signs that moving water changed the chemical makeup of the surface of Mars in recent eras, therefore concluding that its crust is harboring up to three times as much water than was previously thought.
(B) eras, therefore concluding that the planet's crust harbors up to three times as much, or more, water as was
(C) eras and have therefore concluded that the planet's crust harbors up to three times as much water as
For C do you need "was" after as? What is the correct usage here?
is there any other reason also to eliminate B - concluding/concluded ??
- EducationAisle
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:42 pm
- Location: Bangalore, India
- Thanked: 91 times
- Followed by:46 members
The main issue with B is that it seems to suggest as if water concluded something.
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com
Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:
a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana
b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana
Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com
Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:
a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana
b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana
Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
- Thanked: 45 times
- Followed by:2 members
Can you elaborate? I dont think it means the water is concluding. can you please explain it furtherEducationAisle wrote:The main issue with B is that it seems to suggest as if water concluded something.
Also can you give your inputs on the idiom thing i have mentioned above.
- EducationAisle
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:42 pm
- Location: Bangalore, India
- Thanked: 91 times
- Followed by:46 members
That is because concluding... is a participial phrase. For example:
Teacher shouted at the students, intimidating children.
Teacher is the agent/source of intimidation. Ditto with the current sentence.
Teacher shouted at the students, intimidating children.
Teacher is the agent/source of intimidation. Ditto with the current sentence.
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com
Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:
a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana
b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana
Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com
Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:
a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana
b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana
Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
I don't think so that C is correct because words like therefore should be with in the comma.........option A,B and C are all having this problem
- LIL
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:09 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:27 members
this is incorrect. "therefore" doesn't need to be surrounded by commas.aspirant2011 wrote:I don't think so that C is correct because words like therefore should be with in the comma.........option A,B and C are all having this problem
for example:
i think; therefore, i am < haha ok that's sort of like surrounding it by commas
my boyfriend was injured and therefore unable to play in saturday's game.
ron's macbook air is light and therefore easy to carry around.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
- Thanked: 45 times
- Followed by:2 members
sorry for late reply.
But then the word therefore
Doesn't it help in saying that it is scientist who concluded rather than water..
also give your comments on idiom thing- as much, or more, as ....
thanks
But then the word therefore
Doesn't it help in saying that it is scientist who concluded rather than water..
also give your comments on idiom thing- as much, or more, as ....
thanks
EducationAisle wrote:The main issue with B is that it seems to suggest as if water concluded something.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:39 pm
- Thanked: 7 times
- Followed by:1 members
WAS in 'was previously thought' IS REDUNDANT. WAS AND PREVIOUSLY mean the same thing.
Success = Max(Hardwork) + Min(Luck)
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:55 am
- Location: Russia
The problem with choice B is that it distorts the meaning of the original sentence.
The sentence says there is less than or equal to 3 times water (as was previousy thought) , whereas B implies the amount of water could be even more than 3 times.
The sentence says there is less than or equal to 3 times water (as was previousy thought) , whereas B implies the amount of water could be even more than 3 times.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Tommy Wallach
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:58 am
- Location: New York City
- Thanked: 188 times
- Followed by:120 members
- GMAT Score:770
A lot of great discussion here, but I know folks like the final executive order:
Hope that helps!Scientists have found signs that moving water changed the chemical makeup of the surface of Mars in recent eras, therefore concluding that its crust is harboring up to three times as much water than was previously thought.
(A) eras, therefore concluding that its crust is harboring up to three times as much water than was
"its" is incorrect, because it refers to surface, when it should be Mars. Idiom is "as much as," not "as much than".
(B) eras, therefore concluding that the planet's crust harbors up to three times as much water or more as was
"up to" and "or more" are contradictory.
(C) eras and have therefore concluded that the planet's crust harbors up to three times as much water as
CORRECT. The was isn't technically necessary. We add the verb when to elide it would create confusion. For example:
I love you more than Justin Bieber.
Do I love you more than I love Justin Bieber? Or do I love you more than Justin Bieber does? Because there's no way to know for sure, the sentence as written is wrong.
In this example, it would be confusing if the part after the word "as" could also be something that one has (i.e. "Three times as much water as wine."). But it's not, so there's no confusion without "was". Would I prefer it? Sure. But it's not a dealbreaker.
(D) eras and they have concluded, therefore, that its crust harbors up to three times as much water, or more, than
Awkward placement of therefore. Wrong usage of "its". "up to" and "or more" contradiction.
(E) eras and concluded, therefore, that the planet's crust is harboring up to three times more water as was
Awkward placement of therefore. "more than" not "more as".
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT
If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
ManhattanGMAT
If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!