ambiguity?
This topic has expert replies
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1223
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 3:29 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Thanked: 185 times
- Followed by:15 members
I think this is a question of what's "less wrong." The point here is that we need to use present perfect ("have done") to show that it started in the past and still continues today. Everything else is secondary.
I agree that the pronoun "they" is ambiguous. But, it's the "most correct" (or the "least wrong") of all the answer choices.
I agree that the pronoun "they" is ambiguous. But, it's the "most correct" (or the "least wrong") of all the answer choices.
Jim S. | GMAT Instructor | Veritas Prep
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Remember the sentence correction hierarchy:
(1) grammar
(2) meaning
(3) style
Pronoun ambiguity is a style issue, not a grammar issue (i.e. it doesn't violate grammar rules, it just makes the sentence a bit tougher to understand). Therefore, the correct answer to a SC question may not be as stylistically perfect as it could be - but it will always be stylistically superior to the other grammatically correct/true to original meaning answers.
The GMAT is known to tolerate pronoun ambiguity when the meaning of the sentence is clear. A person who's fluent in english recognizes that grapes can't perform actions, but wine growers can, so the meaning of the sentence is clear.
The GMAT will not tolerate pronoun ambiguity in cases in which the sentence could have multiple meanings. For example:
"Bob hates Fred becase he is an idiot"
is ambiguous, because it's possible that Bob is an idiot or that Fred is an idiot.
(1) grammar
(2) meaning
(3) style
Pronoun ambiguity is a style issue, not a grammar issue (i.e. it doesn't violate grammar rules, it just makes the sentence a bit tougher to understand). Therefore, the correct answer to a SC question may not be as stylistically perfect as it could be - but it will always be stylistically superior to the other grammatically correct/true to original meaning answers.
The GMAT is known to tolerate pronoun ambiguity when the meaning of the sentence is clear. A person who's fluent in english recognizes that grapes can't perform actions, but wine growers can, so the meaning of the sentence is clear.
The GMAT will not tolerate pronoun ambiguity in cases in which the sentence could have multiple meanings. For example:
"Bob hates Fred becase he is an idiot"
is ambiguous, because it's possible that Bob is an idiot or that Fred is an idiot.
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course