It was an increase in reported cases of malaria along the Gulf Coast that in 1921
led the health authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human
subjects to the group that later would be called by the name of Unimedco.
(A) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human subjects to the
group that later would be called by the name of
(B) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human subjects to the
group that later to be called by the name of
(C) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation using human subjects to the
group that later would be called by the name of
(D) authorities to grant a permit for human experimentation to the group later
called
(E) authorities to grant a permit for human experimentation to the group that later
would be called by the name of
Unimedco
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
- Thanked: 114 times
- Followed by:12 members
A/B/C - it it not clear who were called Unimedco. It could be either subjects or group. Furthermore AUTHORITIES TO GRANT is prefered over AUTHORITIES' GRANTING.GmatKiss wrote:It was an increase in reported cases of malaria along the Gulf Coast that in 1921
led the health authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human
subjects to the group that later would be called by the name of Unimedco.
(A) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human subjects to the
group that later would be called by the name of
(B) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human subjects to the
group that later to be called by the name of
(C) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation using human subjects to the
group that later would be called by the name of
(D) authorities to grant a permit for human experimentation to the group later
called
(E) authorities to grant a permit for human experimentation to the group that later
would be called by the name of
D vs E - in D THAT is missing and also WOULD BE requird to show that calling by the Unimedco happened after the permission were granted
IMO E
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 6:22 am
- Thanked: 4 times
A?? Because I thought human experimentation is different from experimentation with human subjects.
Human experimentation - refers to experiments performed by humans
while experimentation with human subjects could be a different thing altogether.
Can somebody please explain me if I am wrong?
Human experimentation - refers to experiments performed by humans
while experimentation with human subjects could be a different thing altogether.
Can somebody please explain me if I am wrong?
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:16 am
- Thanked: 37 times
- Followed by:8 members
It boils down to option D and E. E seems to be wordy. IMO DGmatKiss wrote:It was an increase in reported cases of malaria along the Gulf Coast that in 1921
led the health authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human
subjects to the group that later would be called by the name of Unimedco.
(A) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human subjects to the
group that later would be called by the name of
(B) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human subjects to the
group that later to be called by the name of
(C) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation using human subjects to the
group that later would be called by the name of
(D) authorities to grant a permit for human experimentation to the group later
called
(E) authorities to grant a permit for human experimentation to the group that later
would be called by the name of
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:40 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
In A, B and C, an increase in reported cases...led the...granting does not convey the intended meaning. The increase did not lead the granting; it led TO the granting. Eliminate A, B and C.GmatKiss wrote:It was an increase in reported cases of malaria along the Gulf Coast that in 1921
led the health authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human
subjects to the group that later would be called by the name of Unimedco.
(A) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human subjects to the
group that later would be called by the name of
(B) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human subjects to the
group that later to be called by the name of
(C) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation using human subjects to the
group that later would be called by the name of
(D) authorities to grant a permit for human experimentation to the group later
called
(E) authorities to grant a permit for human experimentation to the group that later
would be called by the name of
In E, CALLED by the NAME of is redundant. Eliminate E.
The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
- Thanked: 114 times
- Followed by:12 members
Thanks Mitch.GMATGuruNY wrote:In A, B and C, an increase in reported cases...led the...granting does not convey the intended meaning. The increase did not lead the granting; it led TO the granting. Eliminate A, B and C.GmatKiss wrote:It was an increase in reported cases of malaria along the Gulf Coast that in 1921
led the health authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human
subjects to the group that later would be called by the name of Unimedco.
(A) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human subjects to the
group that later would be called by the name of
(B) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation with human subjects to the
group that later to be called by the name of
(C) authorities' granting a permit for experimentation using human subjects to the
group that later would be called by the name of
(D) authorities to grant a permit for human experimentation to the group later
called
(E) authorities to grant a permit for human experimentation to the group that later
would be called by the name of
In E, CALLED by the NAME of is redundant. Eliminate E.
The correct answer is D.
some related doubt - could you pls clarify:
1) If E were "authorities to grant a permit for human experimentation to the group that later
would be called", would you still select D?
2) Does the 'would be' and 'called' signify the same thing in the given context. If yes, is it because of the use of LATER (LATER CALLED is same as LATER WOULD BE CALLED?)
3) Does Unimedco clearly refers to GROUP in A/B/C?
4) What does '{The increase did not lead the granting}' and '{it led TO the granting} mean - how they are different. Could you pls give some examples
thanks
Patanjali
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
I don't think that the GMAT would force such a choice upon us.patanjali.purpose wrote:
1) If E were "authorities to grant a permit for human experimentation to the group that later
would be called", would you still select D?
The group later called Unimedco = noun + adverb + ADJECTIVE.2) Does the 'would be' and 'called' signify the same thing in the given context. If yes, is it because of the use of LATER (LATER CALLED is same as LATER WOULD BE CALLED?)
Called = adjective. What kind of group? The group CALLED Unimedco.
Later = adverb. When was the group called Unimedco? LATER.
That later would be called Unimedco = pronoun + adverb + VERB.
Here, would be called is a VERB. A VERB must be put in the proper tense. The tense here makes it clear that AFTER the other past actions, the group WOULD BE CALLED Unimedco.
Whereas in the first construction later modifies an adjective (called), here the adverb modifies a verb (would be called).
There is no substantive difference in meaning between the two constructions.
In A, B and C, of Unimedco modifies the name. What kind of NAME? The name OF UNIMEDCO.3) Does Unimedco clearly refers to GROUP in A/B/C?
The increase led the granting means that the increase GUIDED the granting. This is not the intended meaning here.4) What does '{The increase did not lead the granting}' and '{it led TO the granting} mean - how they are different. Could you pls give some examples
The increase led the authorities TO grant the permit means that the increase INDUCED the authorities to grant the permit. This is the intended meaning here.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- bpdulog
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:55 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:1 members
Answer is D.
A B and C can be killed because of the possessive which does not make sense in this context.
Between D and E, E is more wordy.
A B and C can be killed because of the possessive which does not make sense in this context.
Between D and E, E is more wordy.
NO EXCUSES
"Winston tastes good like a cigarette should."
"Winston tastes good like a cigarette should."