Source - GMAT Test Prep
I got the answer right to this, but I don't understand why exactly I arrived at it. Is there a logical/rule-based explanation?
The commission's office of compliance, inspections, and investigations plans to intensfiy its scrutiny of stock analysts to investigate not only whether research is an independent functiona at brokerage firms, but also whether conflicts result when analysts own the stocks they write about or when they are paid for their work by a firm's investment banking division.
1. to investigate not only whether research is an independent functiona at brokerage firms, but also whether conflicts result when analysts own the stocks they write about or when they are
2. to investigate not only whether research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also if conflicts result when analysts own the stocks they write about or they are
3. to not only investigate whether or not research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also if conflicts result when analysts own the stocks they write about or are
4. not only to investigate whether or not research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also whether conflicts result when analysts own the stock they write about or are
5. not only to investigate whether research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also whether conflicts result when analysts own the stock they write about or when
Target Test Prep is 20% off right now!
Use code FLASH20
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
Sentence Correction
This topic has expert replies
-
cans
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 310 times
- Followed by:123 members
- GMAT Score:750
IMO A
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button 
Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]
Cans!!
Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]
Cans!!
IMO A
: subject of when is not clearketaki6 wrote:Source - GMAT Test Prep
I got the answer right to this, but I don't understand why exactly I arrived at it. Is there a logical/rule-based explanation?
The commission's office of compliance, inspections, and investigations plans to intensfiy its scrutiny of stock analysts to investigate not only whether research is an independent functiona at brokerage firms, but also whether conflicts result when analysts own the stocks they write about or when they are paid for their work by a firm's investment banking division.
1. to investigate not only whether research is an independent functiona at brokerage firms, but also whether conflicts result when analysts own the stocks they write about or when they are
2. to investigate not only whether research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also if conflicts result when analysts own the stocks they write about or they are : Parallelism issues
3. to not only investigate whether or not research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also if conflicts result when analysts own the stocks they write about or are : Parallelism issues
4. not only to investigate whether or not research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also whether conflicts result when analysts own the stock they write about or are : Meaning change
5. not only to investigate whether research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also whether conflicts result when analysts own the stock they write about or when
