In Morigia the average age of cars that are still in use has historically been seven years, but now it is nearly nine years. Car manufacturers claim that the current poor economy has forced people to put off buying new cars, and thus when the economy improves, the average age of cars will return to former levels. Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the car manufacturers' prediction?
A. Fewer cars per year are now being manufactured in Morigia than were being manufactured there five years ago.
B. When the threat of job loss is particularly strong, people are reluctant to commit themselves to expensive purchases.
C. The older a car is, the greater the amount of upkeep it requires.
D. The air-pollution control devices now being used in cars manufactured in Morigia cost less than those that were used seven years ago.
E. Most people in Morigia now believe that replacing an old car with a new one has very undesirable ecological consequences.
Target Test Prep is 20% off right now!
Use code FLASH20
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
weaken question!!!
This topic has expert replies
-
Frankenstein
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 375 times
- Followed by:53 members
Hi,
Car manufacturer says economy is the real cause for not buying new cars. E states an alternate cause for not buying new cars. So, E in fact is weakening.
Hence, E
Car manufacturer says economy is the real cause for not buying new cars. E states an alternate cause for not buying new cars. So, E in fact is weakening.
Hence, E
Cheers!
Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
-
amit2k9
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 9:09 am
- Location: pune
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:3 members
Ozlemg wrote:In Morigia the average age of cars that are still in use has historically been seven years, but now it is nearly nine years. Car manufacturers claim that the current poor economy has forced people to put off buying new cars, and thus when the economy improves, the average age of cars will return to former levels. Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the car manufacturers' prediction?
A. Fewer cars per year are now being manufactured in Morigia than were being manufactured there five years ago. -- economy improves -- more cars manufactured ---people buying news cars. POE.
B. When the threat of job loss is particularly strong, people are reluctant to commit themselves to expensive purchases. -- Supports. POE.
C. The older a car is, the greater the amount of upkeep it requires. -- Supports. POE.
D. The air-pollution control devices now being used in cars manufactured in Morigia cost less than those that were used seven years ago. -- Out of scope. POE.
E. Most people in Morigia now believe that replacing an old car with a new one has very undesirable ecological consequences. -- Means even if economy improves people may not purchase new cars. Hence average age might remain the same. OA.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Answer choice [spoiler]"E"[/spoiler] is correct.
"Most" is the word that is important here.
We need to be carfule about word "Many" "some" because we dont have idea about their exact number.
But "most" means more that 50% i.e. majority.
In this answerchoice,if Majority of people thinks that buying new car is not good option then we cant say that improved economy=better car sales.
"Most" is the word that is important here.
We need to be carfule about word "Many" "some" because we dont have idea about their exact number.
But "most" means more that 50% i.e. majority.
In this answerchoice,if Majority of people thinks that buying new car is not good option then we cant say that improved economy=better car sales.
-
sl750
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
- Thanked: 38 times
- Followed by:1 members
Answer choice E weakens the argument the manufactures' prediction that once the economy recovers
people will continue replacing their vehicles every 7 years by stating that if the replacement
results in undesirable ecological consequences they are less likely to replace their vehicle. This
answer choice provides an alternative explanation
people will continue replacing their vehicles every 7 years by stating that if the replacement
results in undesirable ecological consequences they are less likely to replace their vehicle. This
answer choice provides an alternative explanation
-
VivianKerr
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Thanked: 474 times
- Followed by:365 members
Conclusion: Bad economy = not buying new cars, improved economy = average car age will return to 7
Evidence: Average age of cars was 7, but now is 9
Assumption: There is not another reason people have their cars longer (i.e. are the newer cars just better made?); strong link between economy strength & length of time people keep their vehicles
Question: What will WEAKEN the conclusion? (reverse the Assumption)
Prediction: There IS another reason people have their cars longer; there is a WEAK link between economy strength + length of time of vehicle ownership
We can quickly narrow it down to C and E.
C - This is a good option, but not quite strong or specific enough. It is true in general that older cars require more upkeep. This is true for any vehicle. So there must be a better choice that will more seriously weaken the argument.
E - This weakens the argument a LOT because it provides another reason outside of the economy for people not replacing their vehicles.
Evidence: Average age of cars was 7, but now is 9
Assumption: There is not another reason people have their cars longer (i.e. are the newer cars just better made?); strong link between economy strength & length of time people keep their vehicles
Question: What will WEAKEN the conclusion? (reverse the Assumption)
Prediction: There IS another reason people have their cars longer; there is a WEAK link between economy strength + length of time of vehicle ownership
We can quickly narrow it down to C and E.
C - This is a good option, but not quite strong or specific enough. It is true in general that older cars require more upkeep. This is true for any vehicle. So there must be a better choice that will more seriously weaken the argument.
E - This weakens the argument a LOT because it provides another reason outside of the economy for people not replacing their vehicles.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles
Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]
Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"!
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles
Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]
Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"!
