GMAT PREP I EXPONENTS

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 266
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:46 pm
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:690

GMAT PREP I EXPONENTS

by pkw209 » Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:37 am
Hey all,

I think the answer should be B rather than D since the question stem doesn't state positive INTEGER. A brief explanation would be very much appreciated. Thanks!

78) x and y are positive, what is x + y?

a. 2x3y = 72
b. 2x2y = 32

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:41 pm
pkw209 wrote:Hey all,

I think the answer should be B rather than D since the question stem doesn't state positive INTEGER. A brief explanation would be very much appreciated. Thanks!

78) x and y are positive, what is x + y?

a. 2x3y = 72
b. 2x2y = 32
I'm assuming that the question involves exponents (even though it doesn't appear so)
If the question is:
x and y are positive, what is x + y?
(1) (2^x)(3^y) = 72
(2) (2^x)(2^y) = 32

then you're right. The answer should be B.

(1) (2^x)(3^y) = 72
Without getting too out of scope, statement (1) can give us more than one set of values for x and y such that the sum of x and y differ.
Here are two sets:
a) x=3 and y=2 --> x+y equals 5
b) x=log(base2)9 and y=log(base3)8 --> x+y does not equal 5
Don't worry about the logs; they aren't required for the GMAT :-)
INSUFFICIENT


(2) (2^x)(2^y) = 32
(2^x)(2^y) = 2^5
2^(x+y) = 2^5
x+y=5
SUFFICIENT

If the question had restricted x and y to positive integers, the answer would have been D.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:32 am
Location: Karjat
Thanked: 3 times

by linkinpark » Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:43 am
Hi Brent,
I'm slightly confused here regarding stmt 1, aren't x=3 and y = 2 the only values that satisfy (2^x)(3^y) = 72?

I chose D at first.

thanks

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 266
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:46 pm
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:690

by pkw209 » Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:44 pm
Thanks guys. Yes, should be exponents. That's what I thought.

linkin-as Brent explained, because the question stem doesn't state INTEGER, there could be multiple answers (Brent provides 2).

wow I haven't logs since high school :)

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:32 am
Location: Karjat
Thanked: 3 times

by linkinpark » Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:09 pm
I'm still not out of confusion, from my knowledge we're not tested on logarithms on GMAT.

can you tell me what other values of x and y satisfy statement 1 apart from x=3 and y = 2

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 266
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:46 pm
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:690

by pkw209 » Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:20 pm
linkin-

no, logs are not tested. the point that brent was making is that there are other possibilities since x and y do not have to be INTEGERS. this is actually an important concept that must be understood because it's pretty pervasive throughout the gmat.

orig equation -->(2^x)(3^y) = 72

for example, x could be 1/2, then 2 ^ 1/2, which equals sqrt(2) = 1.4

...then 1.4 * 3 ^ y = 72.

Without going further, you have an equation with one variable so if you wanted to you could solve for y.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:32 am
Location: Karjat
Thanked: 3 times

by linkinpark » Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:08 pm
pkw209 wrote:linkin-

no, logs are not tested. the point that brent was making is that there are other possibilities since x and y do not have to be INTEGERS. this is actually an important concept that must be understood because it's pretty pervasive throughout the gmat.

orig equation -->(2^x)(3^y) = 72

for example, x could be 1/2, then 2 ^ 1/2, which equals sqrt(2) = 1.4

...then 1.4 * 3 ^ y = 72.

Without going further, you have an equation with one variable so if you wanted to you could solve for y.
for a moment I agree with you on this but wouldn't it be the same case with stmt 2 ?? sorry for dragging the topic but i feel uneasy until I get it down :P

thanks

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:32 am
Location: Karjat
Thanked: 3 times

by linkinpark » Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:20 pm
oops sorry, now I'm clear with it.

thanks pkw and Brent :)

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:17 pm

by chittychittybangbang » Tue May 10, 2011 5:38 pm
In a problem such as this, are we not suppose to assume that the exponents are integers?