Does 'constant' also mean integer?

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:55 am
Thanked: 12 times

Does 'constant' also mean integer?

by wayofjungle » Sun Apr 17, 2011 1:13 pm
OG assumes this is true, although I thought a constant is defined as any number and not a variable. In the following DS question assuming 'r' is a constant makes both statements sufficient, otherwise assuming 'r' can be a fraction makes them both insufficient (I think).

If r is a constant and a(n) = rn for all positive integers n, for how many values of n is a(n) < 100?
1.) a(50) = 500
2.) a(100) + a(105) = 2050

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 9:23 am
Location: Madison, WI
Thanked: 17 times

by ldoolitt » Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:16 pm
wayofjungle wrote:OG assumes this is true, although I thought a constant is defined as any number and not a variable. In the following DS question assuming 'r' is a constant makes both statements sufficient, otherwise assuming 'r' can be a fraction makes them both insufficient (I think).

If r is a constant and a(n) = rn for all positive integers n, for how many values of n is a(n) < 100?
1.) a(50) = 500
2.) a(100) + a(105) = 2050
Hey wayofjungle,

Could you explain the rationale behind your statement "otherwise assuming 'r' can be a fraction makes them both insufficient (I think)" in this instance? How are you approaching this problem? Just wanted a little additional insight so I might be able to help.

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:55 am
Thanked: 12 times

by wayofjungle » Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:51 pm
Sorry, I confused the properties of r and n after solving for r.

Each statement gives us information to find that r=10, so using this information to restate the question we have:

how many values are there for n that 10*n < 100

because n is defined as an integer there are limited values, 9 in fact.

I dont think GMAT confuses definitions like this on purpose, but even though this question is no longer a good example is it safe to assume a variable labeled 'constant' can signify any single numerical value, integer or fraction?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 9:23 am
Location: Madison, WI
Thanked: 17 times

by ldoolitt » Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:56 pm
wayofjungle wrote:...is it safe to assume a variable labeled 'constant' can signify any single numerical value, integer or fraction?
I believe that 'constant' belongs to the set of reals. It doesn't necessarily have to be an integer or fraction (it could be pi or sqrt(2) for example).

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sun Apr 17, 2011 7:30 pm
wayofjungle wrote:OG assumes this is true, although I thought a constant is defined as any number and not a variable.
Hi,

"constant" is simply the opposite of "variable"; since the GMAT only deals with the set of real numbers, for GMAT purposes a constant is any fixed real number (an integer, fraction, positive, negative, 0, irrational number like pi, etc...).
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course