OG assumes this is true, although I thought a constant is defined as any number and not a variable. In the following DS question assuming 'r' is a constant makes both statements sufficient, otherwise assuming 'r' can be a fraction makes them both insufficient (I think).
If r is a constant and a(n) = rn for all positive integers n, for how many values of n is a(n) < 100?
1.) a(50) = 500
2.) a(100) + a(105) = 2050
Does 'constant' also mean integer?
This topic has expert replies
- wayofjungle
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:55 am
- Thanked: 12 times
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 9:23 am
- Location: Madison, WI
- Thanked: 17 times
Hey wayofjungle,wayofjungle wrote:OG assumes this is true, although I thought a constant is defined as any number and not a variable. In the following DS question assuming 'r' is a constant makes both statements sufficient, otherwise assuming 'r' can be a fraction makes them both insufficient (I think).
If r is a constant and a(n) = rn for all positive integers n, for how many values of n is a(n) < 100?
1.) a(50) = 500
2.) a(100) + a(105) = 2050
Could you explain the rationale behind your statement "otherwise assuming 'r' can be a fraction makes them both insufficient (I think)" in this instance? How are you approaching this problem? Just wanted a little additional insight so I might be able to help.
- wayofjungle
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:55 am
- Thanked: 12 times
Sorry, I confused the properties of r and n after solving for r.
Each statement gives us information to find that r=10, so using this information to restate the question we have:
how many values are there for n that 10*n < 100
because n is defined as an integer there are limited values, 9 in fact.
I dont think GMAT confuses definitions like this on purpose, but even though this question is no longer a good example is it safe to assume a variable labeled 'constant' can signify any single numerical value, integer or fraction?
Each statement gives us information to find that r=10, so using this information to restate the question we have:
how many values are there for n that 10*n < 100
because n is defined as an integer there are limited values, 9 in fact.
I dont think GMAT confuses definitions like this on purpose, but even though this question is no longer a good example is it safe to assume a variable labeled 'constant' can signify any single numerical value, integer or fraction?
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 9:23 am
- Location: Madison, WI
- Thanked: 17 times
I believe that 'constant' belongs to the set of reals. It doesn't necessarily have to be an integer or fraction (it could be pi or sqrt(2) for example).wayofjungle wrote:...is it safe to assume a variable labeled 'constant' can signify any single numerical value, integer or fraction?
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi,wayofjungle wrote:OG assumes this is true, although I thought a constant is defined as any number and not a variable.
"constant" is simply the opposite of "variable"; since the GMAT only deals with the set of real numbers, for GMAT purposes a constant is any fixed real number (an integer, fraction, positive, negative, 0, irrational number like pi, etc...).
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course