Main Idea

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
Thanked: 9 times
Followed by:3 members

Main Idea

by kaulnikhil » Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:28 am
Is it possible to decrease
inflation without causing a recession
and its concomitant increase
line in unemployment? The orthodox
(5) answer is “no.” whether they
support the “inertia” theory of
inflation (that today’s inflation rate
is caused by yesterday’s inflation,
the state of the economic
(10) cycle, and external influences
such as import prices) or the
“rational expectations” theory
(that inflation is caused by
workers’ and employers’ expec-
(15) tations, coupled with a lack of
credible monetary and fiscal
policies), most economists
agree that tight monetary and
fiscal policies, which cause
(20) recessions, are necessary to
decelerate inflation. They point
out that in the 1980’s, many
European countries and the
United States conquered high
(25) (by these countries’ standards)
inflation, but only by applying tight
monetary and fiscal policies that
sharply increased unemployment.
Nevertheless, some govern-
(30) ments’ policymakers insist that
direct controls on wages and
prices, without tight monetary and
fiscal policies, can succeed in
decreasing inflation. Unfortu-
(35) nately, because this approach
fails to deal with the underlying
causes of inflation, wage and
price controls eventually collapse,
the hitherto-repressed
(40) inflation resurfaces, and in the
meantime, though the policymakers
succeed in avoiding a
recession, a frozen structure of
relative prices imposes distor-
(45) tions that do damage to the
economy’s prospects for longterm
growth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. apply two conventional theories.
B examine a generally accepted position
C. support a controversial policy
D. explain the underlying causes of a
phenomenon
E. propose an innovative solution

Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:33 pm
should be between B and D.

IMO - B

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
Thanked: 9 times
Followed by:3 members

by kaulnikhil » Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:00 pm
OA B..
I went for C ..because i thought that he is arguing for usage tight monetary in decreasing inflation ..how did u finalize on B

Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:05 pm
I think nowhere in the passage author supports the theory. The author tries to examine the root cause of inflation....etc.

He does not favors a particular approach and just goes on to examine a particular position..

That is why B...the author does points out the long term affects of that approach but he does not really explains that in detail..!!

I hope you are able to understand.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
Thanked: 9 times
Followed by:3 members

by kaulnikhil » Wed Jul 29, 2009 1:51 pm
Got it dude ..Thaks

User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pm
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 71 times
Followed by:17 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmat740 » Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:06 pm
Hey again opening up this thread.

I have a question from the same passage.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author’s conclusion about the use of wage and price controls?

A. Countries that repeatedly use wage and price controls tend to have lower long-term economic growth rates than do other countries.
B. Countries that have extremely high inflation frequently place very stringent controls on wages and prices in an attempt to decrease the inflation.
C. Some countries have found that the use of wage and price controls succeeds in decreasing inflation but also causes a recession.
D. Policymakers who advocate the use of wage and price controls believe that these controls will deal with the underlying causes of inflation.
E. Policymakers who advocate the use of wage and price controls are usually more concerned about long-term economic goals than about short-term economic goals

Legendary Member
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:14 am
Thanked: 13 times

by ketkoag » Fri Aug 07, 2009 1:05 am
gmat740 wrote:Hey again opening up this thread.

I have a question from the same passage.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author’s conclusion about the use of wage and price controls?

A. Countries that repeatedly use wage and price controls tend to have lower long-term economic growth rates than do other countries.
B. Countries that have extremely high inflation frequently place very stringent controls on wages and prices in an attempt to decrease the inflation.
C. Some countries have found that the use of wage and price controls succeeds in decreasing inflation but also causes a recession.
D. Policymakers who advocate the use of wage and price controls believe that these controls will deal with the underlying causes of inflation.
E. Policymakers who advocate the use of wage and price controls are usually more concerned about long-term economic goals than about short-term economic goals
IMO D

Legendary Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:00 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:3 members

by ssgmatter » Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:31 pm
Can somebody pleaes explain the answer for the question as posted by Karan here.....

Regards,
Phil

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:50 pm

by kiran77 » Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:13 pm
Option D

Refer line 35...
Unfortunately, because this approach fails to deal with the underlying causes of inflation....

My perception:
The word "unfortunately" in this context infers that - control of prices didn't alleviate inflation. So we can infer that the policy makers believed that control of prices will deal with the causes of inflation.

So for me D seems more plausible.

Regards,
Kiran.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:46 am

by vamsi999 » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:48 pm
In the same RC...I got a doubt ---

The passage suggests that the high inflation in the
United States and many European countries in the
1980's differed from inflation elsewhere in which of
the following ways?
A. It fit the rational expectations theory of inflation
but not the inertia theory of inflation.
B. It was possible to control without causing a
recession.
C. It was easier to control in those countries by
applying tight monetary and fiscal policies
than it would have been elsewhere.
D. It was not caused by workers' and employers'
expectations.
E. It would not necessarily be considered high
elsewhere.


Answer is E. Can some one explain why not B??

Thanks in advance,
Vamsi.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 12:37 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by sk8legend408 » Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:22 am
Vamsi,

The answer is E because the passage states that "many European countries and the United States conquered high (by these countries' standards) inflation."

This implies that the inflation experienced by the US and Europe in the 80's would differ from inflation in other countries by not necessarily being considered high.

Legendary Member
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:12 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by mankey » Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:29 am
In the same RC...I got a doubt ---

The passage suggests that the high inflation in the
United States and many European countries in the
1980's differed from inflation elsewhere in which of
the following ways?
A. It fit the rational expectations theory of inflation
but not the inertia theory of inflation.
B. It was possible to control without causing a
recession.
C. It was easier to control in those countries by
applying tight monetary and fiscal policies
than it would have been elsewhere.
D. It was not caused by workers' and employers'
expectations.
E. It would not necessarily be considered high
elsewhere.


Answer is E. Can some one explain why not B??
Please explain this.

Thanks.

Legendary Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
Thanked: 114 times
Followed by:12 members

by patanjali.purpose » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:58 pm
kaulnikhil wrote:Is it possible to decrease
inflation without causing a recession
and its concomitant increase
line in unemployment? The orthodox
(5) answer is �no.� whether they
support the �inertia� theory of
inflation (that today�s inflation rate
is caused by yesterday�s inflation,
the state of the economic
(10) cycle, and external influences
such as import prices) or the
�rational expectations� theory
(that inflation is caused by
workers� and employers� expec-
(15) tations, coupled with a lack of
credible monetary and fiscal
policies), most economists
agree that tight monetary and
fiscal policies, which cause
(20) recessions, are necessary to
decelerate inflation. They point
out that in the 1980�s, many
European countries and the
United States conquered high
(25) (by these countries� standards)
inflation, but only by applying tight
monetary and fiscal policies that
sharply increased unemployment.
Nevertheless, some govern-
(30) ments� policymakers insist that
direct controls on wages and
prices, without tight monetary and
fiscal policies, can succeed in
decreasing inflation. Unfortu-
(35) nately, because this approach
fails to deal with the underlying
causes of inflation, wage and
price controls eventually collapse,
the hitherto-repressed
(40) inflation resurfaces, and in the
meantime, though the policymakers
succeed in avoiding a
recession, a frozen structure of
relative prices imposes distor-
(45) tions that do damage to the
economy�s prospects for longterm
growth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. apply two conventional theories.
B examine a generally accepted position
C. support a controversial policy
D. explain the underlying causes of a
phenomenon
E. propose an innovative solution
I am confused btn B/C - can anyone help. I get a feeling that author is supporting the orthodox way of handling the situation and therefore C

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:38 am
Location: Hyderabad, India
Thanked: 49 times
Followed by:12 members
GMAT Score:700

by bubbliiiiiiii » Thu Jul 26, 2012 12:22 am
I am confused btn B/C - can anyone help. I get a feeling that author is supporting the orthodox way of handling the situation and therefore C
Author in the passage describes other way of handling inflation but immediately discards it because it is applicable only for short term and it ignores long term consequences.

Thus not E.

Hope it helps.
Regards,

Pranay

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:53 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:4 members

by ankit0411 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:48 am
ketkoag wrote:
gmat740 wrote:Hey again opening up this thread.

I have a question from the same passage.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the author�s conclusion about the use of wage and price controls?

A. Countries that repeatedly use wage and price controls tend to have lower long-term economic growth rates than do other countries.
B. Countries that have extremely high inflation frequently place very stringent controls on wages and prices in an attempt to decrease the inflation.
C. Some countries have found that the use of wage and price controls succeeds in decreasing inflation but also causes a recession.
D. Policymakers who advocate the use of wage and price controls believe that these controls will deal with the underlying causes of inflation.
E. Policymakers who advocate the use of wage and price controls are usually more concerned about long-term economic goals than about short-term economic goals


IMO D
Answer to this questions is A .
Don't predict future , create it !