Near to SAT Difficulty

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 am
Location: India
Thanked: 64 times
Followed by:6 members
GMAT Score:760

Near to SAT Difficulty

by harsh.champ » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:12 pm
Among the many reasons for his defeat in the election was his arrogant assumption that his constituents were incapable of understanding economic conditions, and his unwarranted attack on his chief opponent.

A. was his arrogant assumption that his constituents were incapable of understanding economic conditions
B. were his arrogant assumption that his constituents were incapable of understanding economic conditions
C. were his arrogant assumptions that his constituents were incapable of understanding economical conditions
D. were his arrogant assumption that his constituents would be incapable of understanding economics
E. was the arrogant assumption that his constituents was incapable of understanding economic conditions

I am not sure whether to take assumption or assumptions as in the former part it is written "among".
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 6:06 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:700

by viidyasagar » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:32 pm
Among the many reasons for his defeat in the election was his arrogant assumption that his constituents were incapable of understanding economic conditions, and his unwarranted attack on his chief opponent.

A. was his arrogant assumption that his constituents were incapable of understanding economic conditions
B. were his arrogant assumption that his constituents were incapable of understanding economic conditions
C. were his arrogant assumptions that his constituents were incapable of understanding economical conditions
D. were his arrogant assumption that his constituents would be incapable of understanding economics
E. was the arrogant assumption that his constituents was incapable of understanding economic conditions
my answer is B

Concept tested - was vs. were, assumption vs. assumptions

A. was his arrogant assumption that his constituents were incapable of understanding economic conditions - since the non-underlined part contains "many reasons", "were" is a must. Eliminate A and E

D - contains a "would be" about an action that has already taken place. would is wrong

B and C are close
am not sure whether to take assumption or assumptions as in the former part it is written "among".
He has made only one assumption, viz., his constituents were incapable of understanding economic conditions, hence plural "assumptions" is unnecessary.

The plural "Were" refers to the 2 reasons of his defeat.....1. incorrect assumption and 2. unwarranted attack

I go with B

Source please!!!

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 am
Location: India
Thanked: 64 times
Followed by:6 members
GMAT Score:760

by harsh.champ » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:56 pm
viidyasagar wrote:
Among the many reasons for his defeat in the election was his arrogant assumption that his constituents were incapable of understanding economic conditions, and his unwarranted attack on his chief opponent.

A. was his arrogant assumption that his constituents were incapable of understanding economic conditions
B. were his arrogant assumption that his constituents were incapable of understanding economic conditions
C. were his arrogant assumptions that his constituents were incapable of understanding economical conditions
D. were his arrogant assumption that his constituents would be incapable of understanding economics
E. was the arrogant assumption that his constituents was incapable of understanding economic conditions
my answer is B

Concept tested - was vs. were, assumption vs. assumptions

A. was his arrogant assumption that his constituents were incapable of understanding economic conditions - since the non-underlined part contains "many reasons", "were" is a must. Eliminate A and E

D - contains a "would be" about an action that has already taken place. would is wrong

B and C are close
am not sure whether to take assumption or assumptions as in the former part it is written "among".
He has made only one assumption, viz., his constituents were incapable of understanding economic conditions, hence plural "assumptions" is unnecessary.

The plural "Were" refers to the 2 reasons of his defeat.....1. incorrect assumption and 2. unwarranted attack

I go with B

Source please!!!
The source is a SC test I had attempted in www.majortests.com.


Though,now I understand the reasoning.Thanks.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P